How Does Integrating mgR Relate to Force and Work in a Semicircle?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between force, work, and integration in the context of a semicircular path. Participants are exploring how to calculate work done by a force acting on a particle moving along this path, particularly focusing on the gravitational force and its components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the integration process and the interpretation of forces involved, particularly the gravitational force and its components. There is confusion regarding the definition of work in relation to external forces and the correct limits of integration based on the semicircular path.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing differing perspectives on the forces and integration involved. Some are clarifying the definitions and relationships between work and force, while others are questioning assumptions about angles and limits of integration. No consensus has been reached, but there is a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the implications of integrating over a semicircular path and the varying nature of the force due to the angle of displacement. There is mention of specific angles and their impact on the calculations, as well as the need to clarify the definition of external force in this context.

omarMihilmy
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1387274814.891516.jpg


Okay so the answer in b) is mgR how is this possible when we integrate ?

The work is the external force right?
Secondly the F inside the integral is the mg sin(theta) the force of gravity?
dr ---> pi R (semicircle)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force, according to the problem, is [itex]mg cos(\theta)[/itex]. Are you saying you do not believe that?

I don't know what you mean by "dr--> pi R". First, in this problem you are dealing with [tex]d\vec{r}[/tex], not "dr". (Since we are moving on a circle, r is constant and dr= 0!) On a circle of radius r, [itex]x= r cos(\theta)[/itex] and [itex]y= r sin(\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]\vec{r}= r cos(\theta)\vec{i}+ r sin(\theta)\vec{j}[/itex] and [itex]d\vec{r}= -r sin(\theta)\vec{i}+ r cos(\theta)\vec{j} d\theta[/itex]

No, the "work" is NOT the "external force". Work is not force. And since there is only one force here, I don't know what you mean by "external" force.
 
No I believe that no problem. Force done by pulling the small particle is mgcos(θ)

my problem is with the work done by that force to pull the particle is the W = ∫F.dr
This is the work done by the external force in puling the particle which should be the mgcos(θ) x the distance moved

We integrate here because the force done varies with the displacement moved due to the angle.

In the integral I will add the which force the gravitational force which is mg j
the dr⃗ =−rsin(θ)i⃗ +rcos(θ)j⃗ dθ

when we integrate this it will lead us to mgr be outside the integral and cosine(θ) which integrate to sin(θ)

Work done is mgRsin(θ) not mgR

or did he assume that the angle is 90 which is 1 ?

please help with that work part and correct me if I ma giving an faulty information
 
omarMihilmy said:
or did he assume that the angle is 90 which is 1 ?
It says: "... from the bottom to the top", so what is the range for theta?
 
180 sin180 is 0 so the whole thing is zero?
 
omarMihilmy said:
180 sin180 is 0 so the whole thing is zero?
No, not 180. It's a half cylinder lying on its flat side.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Its a semi-circle with 180 degrees
A full circle is 360
Quarter is 90

Cant argue with that!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K