How Does Magnetism Influence Black Holes Despite Escape Velocity Challenges?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Magnetism plays a significant role in the dynamics of black holes, particularly in the context of accretion discs. While particles cannot escape from within a black hole's event horizon due to extreme escape velocities, magnetic fields can extend beyond this boundary, influencing matter in the vicinity. Hawking radiation allows for energy to escape, albeit at negligible levels over cosmic timescales. The discussion highlights skepticism regarding the assertion that magnetism is the primary force drawing gas from orbiting stars into black holes, emphasizing the importance of gravitational forces and the chaotic nature of particle movement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of black hole physics and event horizons
  • Familiarity with Hawking radiation and its implications
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic forces and their properties
  • Basic principles of accretion discs and gravitational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and implications of Hawking radiation
  • Explore the role of magnetic fields in astrophysical phenomena
  • Study the dynamics of accretion discs around black holes
  • Investigate the concept of magnetic monopoles in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of physics interested in the interplay between magnetism and black hole dynamics will benefit from this discussion.

Maplesyrup
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I read recently that magnetism plays an important role in cramming all that matter into a black hole. But how is it possible that magnetic force could escape a black hole, having an escape velocity higher than the speed of light, therefore an impossibility of matter(or energy) escaping?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Maplesyrup said:
I read recently that magnetism plays an important role in cramming all that matter into a black hole.

Where exactly?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Where exactly?

http://news.nationalgeographic.com.au/news/2006/06/060621-black-holes.html


/\There and about a million other sites
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Energy can escape from a black hole (it's called Hawking radiation). Levels of hawking radiation are meant to be so low that it would take longer than the predicted lifetime of the universe for a black hole to evaporate though.

I see no reason why a black hole couldn't have a magnetic effect though (who knows, black holes may actually be magnetic monopoles :)). Particles can't escape from the black hole, but that's not to say that the black hole couldn't have a magnetic field with the electromagnetic force carried by particles that are created on the edge of the event horizon... black holes are a fairly large mystery still though (I remember one student of physics once telling me that equations regarding black holes are 'you have the equations that calculate what our theories say about black holes... then you add in a huge fudge factor that brings the calculations in line with what we've observed about black holes'... hardly good science there yet :))
 
So its the accretion disc having the magnetic tug rather than the actual black hole. Thanx a lot makes a lot more sense:D
 
Maplesyrup said:
I read recently that magnetism plays an important role in cramming all that matter into a black hole. But how is it possible that magnetic force could escape a black hole, having an escape velocity higher than the speed of light, therefore an impossibility of matter(or energy) escaping?

Gravity extends beyond the event horizon and so does magnetism. The event horizon is just the distance that light falls back inwards.

To be honest, I am a bit skeptical of these researchers for saying that it must be magnetism that sucks gas from an orbiting star into the black hole. Gas particles bounce around in all different directions, meaning that a star which is barely in a stable orbit will have lots of gas particles constantly falling out of that stable orbit. Also, the magnetic force has a relatively short range compared to gravity.
 
Maplesyrup said:
So its the accretion disc having the magnetic tug rather than the actual black hole. Thanx a lot makes a lot more sense:D

It makes sense to me as a way for the particles of force to exist with a magnetic field extending beyond the event horizon. I'm not saying it is correct, and I think junglebeast makes a better point in being skeptical of the idea and the accretion disk building up from random movements of an orbiting stars matter (Brownian motion, yes?).

Still, there is no reason why a black hole can't have a magnetic field and there are numerous ways for the force particles to exist and transmit the force, so that doesn't count against the idea.
 
I think that is discussing external magnetic fields. Core collapse black holes should have only a small field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K