How Does Mud Impact the Angular Velocity of a Pivoted Meter Rule?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of a 20g piece of mud traveling at 5 m/s on the angular velocity of a pivoted metre rule. The moment of inertia of the system is given as 0.02 kg·m². The correct initial angular velocity calculated is 2.5 rad/s, derived from the equation for angular momentum (mv = Iω). Participants clarify the importance of unit conversion and the correct application of the momentum transfer principle in rotational dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its conservation
  • Familiarity with the moment of inertia in rotational motion
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions in physics (m, kg, s)
  • Proficiency in applying the formula mv = Iω for rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of angular momentum conservation in rotational systems
  • Learn about calculating moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular velocity
  • Practice problems involving unit conversions in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying rotational dynamics and angular momentum, as well as anyone preparing for physics examinations involving these concepts.

Harmony
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
A metre rule is freely pivoted about its centre. A piece of mud of mass 20g traveling at 5ms-1 strikes and sticks to one end of the rule so that the rule starts to rotate in a horizontal circle. If the moment of Inertia of the rule and the mud about the pivot is 0.02kgm^2, the initial angular velocity of the rule is...(Answer:2.5rads-1)

I have made assumption that the momentum of the mud is transfer solely to
the angular momentum. (mv=Iw)
I got the answer 5 rads-1, obviously wrong. I believe that my assumption is wrong. How should I attempt this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mks units

hi harmony

make sure you convert all units to m-> meters, k-> kilograms, and s-> seconds...then you should get the correct answer with your assumption.

ahhh actually I am wrong i was reading your post backwards. i thought 5 rad/s was the correct answer...gonna have to think about this for a little while

gabe
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K