How does one calculate Momentum of an object?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Brock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation and conceptual understanding of momentum, particularly in relation to kinetic energy (KE) and their conservation during interactions between objects. Participants explore the definitions, differences, and implications of momentum as a vector quantity compared to KE as a scalar, as well as the conservation laws applicable in various scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that momentum is defined as mass times velocity (p=mv) and is always conserved in interactions between masses, while energy can change forms and is not necessarily conserved as kinetic energy.
  • Others highlight the distinction that momentum is a vector quantity, having both magnitude and direction, whereas kinetic energy is a scalar quantity with magnitude only.
  • There is a contention regarding the conservation of momentum when an object collides with a spring, with some arguing that momentum is not conserved during the compression phase, while others maintain that momentum conservation applies to the entire system, including the spring and its attachment to the Earth.
  • Participants discuss scenarios involving two equal mass objects colliding with a spring, debating whether momentum is conserved during the slowing down and reacceleration phases.
  • One participant questions whether two objects with the same kinetic energy but different masses have different momenta, suggesting that while their momenta may have the same magnitude, they are moving in opposite directions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conservation of momentum, particularly in relation to interactions involving springs. While some argue that momentum is conserved in all cases, others contend that it is not conserved during specific phases of interaction. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some claims depend on specific assumptions about the systems being analyzed, such as the attachment of the spring to the Earth and the nature of the interactions between the objects involved. The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps regarding the conservation laws in different scenarios.

Brock
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Ok momentum is not KE, but one can calculate the amount of KE stopping the object and measureing how high it raised a weight, or now much frictional heat it generated. If momentum would be a different number, then how do you measure it?

What is momentum? KE will also travel in the same direction until a force is acted upon it, so what is the purpose of having a term called momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Momentum is mass times velocity, typically written p=mv. Kinetic Energy is mv^2/2. In any interaction between two masses momentum is always conserved. Energy is conserved also, but it can change forms from kinetic energy to heat energy for example. Or the kinetic energy can be stored in a spring or as potential energy. So even though energy is always conserved, it does not have to be conserved as kinetic energy. But regardless of the interaction momentum is conserved.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: halo168
Another difference between momentum and KE is that momentum is a vector (has magnitude and direction) whereas KE is a scalar (magnitude only).
 
Subductionzon said:
Momentum is mass times velocity, typically written p=mv. Kinetic Energy is mv^2/2. In any interaction between two masses momentum is always conserved. Energy is conserved also, but it can change forms from kinetic energy to heat energy for example. Or the kinetic energy can be stored in a spring or as potential energy. So even though energy is always conserved, it does not have to be conserved as kinetic energy. But regardless of the interaction momentum is conserved.

If momentum and KE is conserved, but KE can be conserved as PE like in a spring, then what happened to the momentum of the object after it hit the spring? It's not conserved like the KE is, and there's no term for potental momentum. KE and momentum must match up meaning where's there's some KE there must be some momentum, and visversa. But momentum is not conserved when a spring is compressed.
 
When talking about conservation of momentum in this case, you have to include the momentum of whatever the spring is attached to. If the spring is effectively attached to the Earth, then when the object collides with the spring and compresses it, the Earth recoils with a very very very very small velocity because of its very very very very large mass.
 
jtbell said:
When talking about conservation of momentum in this case, you have to include the momentum of whatever the spring is attached to. If the spring is effectively attached to the Earth, then when the object collides with the spring and compresses it, the Earth recoils with a very very very very small velocity because of its very very very very large mass.

Ok then take two objects of equal mass in space. They fly at each other and hit a spring inbetween them. Energy is conserved because KE turns into PE. But for the time the objects are slowing down, stopped, and reaccelerating, their momentum is not conserved.
 
Momentum is conserved, because as it has been indicated, momentum is a vector quantity. To put a coordinate system on your example, two objects of equal mass flying in space. If one is flying in the +x direction, and the other in the -x direction, the total momentum of the system is exactly zero. So, when they hit the spring, we expect momentum to remain the same (zero), and it is.
 
Nabeshin said:
Momentum is conserved, because as it has been indicated, momentum is a vector quantity. To put a coordinate system on your example, two objects of equal mass flying in space. If one is flying in the +x direction, and the other in the -x direction, the total momentum of the system is exactly zero. So, when they hit the spring, we expect momentum to remain the same (zero), and it is.

So if a light object pushes off a heavy object, then they're moving in opposite directions and with the same KE, but do they have different momentums?
 
Brock said:
But momentum is not conserved when a spring is compressed.
Brock said:
But for the time the objects are slowing down, stopped, and reaccelerating, their momentum is not conserved.
Momentum is always conserved for any isolated system. This is a direct consequence of Newton's 3rd law.
 
  • #10
Brock said:
So if a light object pushes off a heavy object, then they're moving in opposite directions and with the same KE, but do they have different momentums?

The objects do have different momenta, because they will be moving in opposite directions. The magnitudes of the momenta will be the same though.

I'm not sure if the kinetic energies necessarily have to be the same, though. (This would mean that the distance the force of one objcet on the other is applied through is the same for both objects, and this doesn't necessarily seem intuitive to me.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K