How Does Particle P Chase Particle Q on a Circular Path?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of particle P chasing particle Q along a circular path of radius R, with speeds u and v, respectively. The analysis reveals that if u > v, particle P will never reach Q, while if u < v, P will eventually spiral inward towards Q. The participants derive equations for angular velocity and radial components, concluding that P's path approximates a logarithmic spiral before transitioning to a circular trajectory. The time taken for P to reach a circular path is determined by the relationship between u and v, with specific equations guiding the calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular velocity and tangential velocity equations
  • Familiarity with differential equations in motion analysis
  • Knowledge of polar coordinates and their applications in trajectory analysis
  • Basic principles of calculus for integration and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of angular velocity equations in circular motion
  • Learn about differential equations related to motion in polar coordinates
  • Explore the characteristics of logarithmic spirals and their mathematical representations
  • Investigate the conditions under which a particle can achieve a circular path while chasing another
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on dynamics and motion analysis, as well as mathematicians interested in differential equations and spiral trajectories.

  • #31
That was not what I meant. By path, I meant the trajectory it adopts before it has attained the desired radius. After that, I had taken it for granted that the particles move in concentric circles ( in my book, there was a hint given which said that). So, you mean that it can either keep on moving in a circle, or spiral back into its centre after attaining the radius?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Kavya Chopra said:
I meant the trajectory it adopts before it has attained the desired radius
OK, but the plot you posted had it returning to the origin.
Kavya Chopra said:
I had taken it for granted that the particles move in concentric circles
Without the equations, you could not be sure whether it would attain a perfectly circular path or merely spiral ever closer to one, never quite getting there. I think many would have guessed the latter (as I did), and you yourself kept mentioning a spiral.
Kavya Chopra said:
So, you mean that it can either keep on moving in a circle, or spiral back into its centre after attaining the radius?
Both behaviours satisfy your differential equation, but only switching to the circle centred on the origin satisfies the given conditions. In an earlier post, your were recommended to rust the equations, but you can only put full trust in the equations if they encapsulate all the given information. The differential equation does not achieve that.
 
  • #33
The spiral I had mentioned was referring to a logarithmic spiral initially, before it attains a circular shape. More appropriately, it was a logarithmic spiral which terminated into a circle, because the radial component will keep on decreasing, and eventually it will become 0 otherwise in the case of v<u the particle would keep on moving away from Q. In the terminated circle path, at least it maintains a constant distance. The reverse spiral requires the component of the radial velocity to instantaneously become 0, and then increase again(magnitude wise). But as I said, in my book, it was mentioned that after attaining the radius, it will follow a circular path. Even though the spiral satisfies the equation What I was interested in knowing was what path it will take as it approaches the radius the first time from the centre i.e. before attaining the radius, and that path was the spiral I was referring to.
 
  • #34
And is there another equation that can give me the desired information apart from this differential equation, or do I have to depend only on the problem statement for the same?
 
  • #35
Kavya Chopra said:
in the case of v<u the particle would keep on moving away from Q
No, it can't do that because of the "chase" condition. It can never move further from its target.
Kavya Chopra said:
it was a logarithmic spiral
But it isn't.
I may have confused you by referring to the trajectory "you" plotted. Looking back through the posts I see it was PumpkinCougar that plotted the circular path. The circular arc of radius u/(2ω) plotted there is correct, but only until it reaches distance u/ω from the origin. Maybe you could describe this as a spiral, though certainly not a logarithmic one, but it would be more accurate to describe it as a semicircular arc.
Kavya Chopra said:
is there another equation that can give me the desired information
Not really. You just have to be aware that the differential equation
##\dot r^2=u^2-(r\omega)^2##
has more than one solution, and make sure that you always pick the one which conforms to the "chase" condition.
In particular, watch out for ##\dot r=-\sqrt{u^2-(r\omega)^2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kavya Chopra
  • #36
Yes...that was what I wanted to know, because I had thought it would be a spiral but I didn't know the shape of it.Then I came across the logarithmic spiral, and it was the nearest shape that had come close to how I visualized the path. It was an intuitive guess, even though the parameters were incorrect.
Thanks a lot. It makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K