How Does Particle P's Motion Change After 2 Seconds?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JJ!
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the motion of particle P after 2 seconds, given its initial position, velocity, and constant acceleration. The particle starts at (2,6) and moves with a velocity of (3i + j) ms-1 and acceleration of (16i + 24j) ms-2. Participants emphasize the need to show calculations to confirm that the particle moves directly away from the origin O and to find its speed at that time. There is confusion about the approach and formulas required to solve the problem, with a suggestion that moving directly away from O might imply a northward direction. Overall, the thread seeks guidance on the correct mathematical methods to analyze the particle's motion.
JJ!
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this question, please?

A particle P is initially at the point (2,6) in relation to an origin, O, and is moving with velocity (3i + j) ms-. It has constant acceleration (16i + 24j) ms-. Show that after 2 seconds it is moving directly away from O, and find its speed at that time.

I would greatly appreciate any help, also details of how to get the answer would be excellent!

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums. Please note that, for homework questions, you are required to show some work before we can help you. Also, in the future, please post in the relevant homework/coursework forum.

So, how do you think you'll approach this question?
 
Sorry about not posting this in the correct place.

Well with this question, I was not sure about what I need to work out. Considering it is asking for me to firstly show its moving directly away from O, I thought that this may mean that moving directly away is the same as traveling due North (where i = 0).

The initial point (2,6) in component form would be (2i + 6j) with a magnitude of 6.32.

Though I am unsure as to what formula I need to apply to calculate the answer. (sorry for sounding so uncertain!)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top