How Does Phase Angle Affect Current in an Undriven RLC Circuit?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an undriven RLC circuit with a fully charged capacitor. The original poster attempts to derive an expression for the current in the circuit, given the charge function and initial conditions, while grappling with the implications of the phase angle on the current.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between charge and current, noting that current is the derivative of charge. There is uncertainty regarding the role of the phase angle in an undriven circuit compared to a driven one. Questions arise about the physical meaning of the phase angle and its implications for current and voltage in the circuit.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the mathematical relationships governing the circuit, while others are exploring the implications of their findings. There is an ongoing examination of the phase angle's effect on the current expression, with no explicit consensus reached on the physical interpretation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of an applied voltage in the circuit and the challenge of deriving expressions for the current and phase angle based on the given conditions. The discussion includes references to specific equations and relationships relevant to the circuit's behavior.

brollysan
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am given a RLC circuit in series with a fully charged C. There is no applied voltage at this part of the problem.

Using kirchhoff I arrive at a second order diff.eq which leads me to the (correct) solution for the charge in the capacitor: q(t) = Q0exp(-t/T)cos(wt + Ø)

Now I am to derive an expression for the current in the circuit.

I am also given I(0) = 0, and q(0) = 1. T and W are known. The problem here is finding I(t) for the circuit, I have no clue what to do with the phase angle Ø.


Homework Equations



Unknowns are Q0 and Ø

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that since all elements are in series the current is equal everywhere, and that I(t) = dq/dt.

I know that if the circuit is driven the current/voltage is out of phase over the RLC. But this is not driven, what happens to the phase? If someone could clarify the physics of the phase in a driven and undriven RLC I would greatly appreciate it.

I can make the math work but the expression for I(t) is looking very with a cos(wt + atan(ugly expression)).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brollysan said:

Homework Statement


I am given a RLC circuit in series with a fully charged C. There is no applied voltage at this part of the problem.

Using kirchhoff I arrive at a second order diff.eq which leads me to the (correct) solution for the charge in the capacitor: q(t) = Q0exp(-t/T)cos(wt + Ø)

Now I am to derive an expression for the current in the circuit.

I am also given I(0) = 0, and q(0) = 1. T and W are known. The problem here is finding I(t) for the circuit, I have no clue what to do with the phase angle Ø.


Homework Equations



Unknowns are Q0 and Ø

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that since all elements are in series the current is equal everywhere, and that I(t) = dq/dt.

I know that if the circuit is driven the current/voltage is out of phase over the RLC. But this is not driven, what happens to the phase? If someone could clarify the physics of the phase in a driven and undriven RLC I would greatly appreciate it.

I can make the math work but the expression for I(t) is looking very with a cos(wt + atan(ugly expression)).

I think you need one or more of the following equations:

I(t) = C \frac{dV_C(t)}{dt} current through a capacitor

V_L(t) = L \frac{dI(t)}{dt} voltage across an inductor
 
Well

With T = 2L/R and W = sqrt [(R/2L)^2 - 1/LC]

Since q(t) = Q0exp(-t/T)cos(wt + Ø), and q(0) = 1 then =>

a: 1 = Q0cos(Ø)

then dq/dt = I(t) and I(t=0) = 0 =>

b: dq/dt = Q0[(-1/T)*exp(-t/T)*cos(wt +Ø) - wexp(-t/T)sin(wt +Ø)] which implies:

0 = (-1/T)*cos(Ø) - w*sin(Ø) => Ø = atan(-1/wT)

No we have a solution for Q0 and Ø, so we should have a known expression for I(t) but the problem is that if you insert for Q0 and Ø in the equation for I(t) you get something very ugly and something dependent on the phase Ø.

Now my problem is that although this makes mathematic sense is this correct in a physical since? I am to later in the assigment compare this with a numerical solution with L = 1, C = 1 og R = 0.2 (dimensionless) but you can already see that the phase will become imaginery for the analytic solution.

Edit: Actually atan doesn't make sense for an imaginery number..

What does that mean? If the current/voltage is out of phase over a component in the circuit, is it also out of phase in the wiring in between? I(t) is the same everywhere in a series so if they are out of phase in the wiring this implies that the voltage is also constant?

There is no added voltage to the circuit btw, it is just a charged capacitor.
 
Last edited:
Current and voltage are out of phase at the reactive components L & C, per the differential equations in my previous post. I and V are in phase at the resistor R.
 
brollysan said:
a: 1 = Q0cos(Ø)

Ø = atan(-1/wT)

You got these two equations for Q0 and Ø, and the expression for I=dq/dt

I =Q0[(-1/T)*exp(-t/T)*cos(wt +Ø) - wexp(-t/T)sin(wt +Ø)].

You know that Ø=-atan(1/(wT)), that is tan(Ø)=-1/(wT). Use the relation between cosine and tangent to get cos(Ø):

cos(Ø)=√[1/(1+tan2(Ø))]

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
952
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K