How Does Quantum Uncertainty Define the Position of a Positron?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the minimum volume in which a positron is located, given its velocity measurements. Participants explore the implications of quantum uncertainty, specifically using the relation ΔX_i Δv_i = ħ / (2m) to derive the minimum volume formula. There is some confusion regarding whether the calculated volume represents the full space or only a portion, with suggestions that the dimensions should account for the ± uncertainties. The conversation also touches on the use of vectors in quantum physics and whether the errors in velocity measurements can be treated independently. Ultimately, the group emphasizes the importance of considering uncertainty in all three spatial dimensions to accurately represent the positron's position.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
The velocity of a positron is measured to be: ##v_x = (4.00 \pm 0.18)10^5## m/sec, ##v_y = (0.34 \pm 0.12) 10^5## m/sec, ##v_z = (1.41 \pm 0.08) 10^5 ## m/sec. Within what minimum volume was the positron located at the moment the measurement was carried out?

So, let's assumed ##v_i = (v_i \pm \Delta v_i)##. We can say that, for minimum values, $$\Delta X_i \Delta v_i = \hbar / (2m)$$.

$$\Delta X_i = \frac{\hbar}{2 m \Delta v_i} \implies V_{min} = \Delta X \Delta Y \Delta Z = \frac{\hbar}{2 \Delta v_x m } \frac{\hbar}{2 \Delta v_y m} \frac{\hbar}{2 \Delta v_z m} = (\frac{\hbar}{2m})^3 \frac{1}{ \Delta v_x \Delta v_y \Delta v_z}$$

Where, for example, ##|\Delta v_x| = 0.18*10^5##

Is that right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Informative
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Where are your units and does your result make sense dimensionally
 
Orodruin said:
Where are your units and does your result make sense dimensionally
Ops, i forgot i should have been used momentum. Wait a minut, will edit it.
 
Does that give the full volume or only one eighth?
 
haruspex said:
Does that give the full volume or only one eighth?
I don't know? At least i think it should give the full volume. But i am asking Because i am not sure of my answer also.
 
Herculi said:
I don't know? At least i think it should give the full volume. But i am asking Because i am not sure of my answer also.
Your ##\Delta X_i## are ##\pm##, so aren't the sides of the cube ##2\Delta X_i##?
As to whether your approach is in itself correct I do not know. I have never been able to find a description of quantum physics that uses vectors, so I could have believed the vector form was ##\Delta\vec x.\Delta\vec p\geq\frac\hbar 2##, or maybe ##\Delta\vec x.\Delta\vec p\geq 3\frac\hbar 2##
 
Naive ? If the errors in the measurements are independent, don't we get ##|v| = (4.25\pm0.25)\ \times 10^5 ## m/s ? And take it from there ?
 
BvU said:
Naive ? If the errors in the measurements are independent, don't we get ##|v| = (4.25\pm0.25)\ \times 10^5 ## m/s ? And take it from there ?
No, that would not represent the situation fully as you also have bounds on the direction. The easiest is to work in the three independent directions, noting that the uncertainty relation holds in each of these.
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
Back
Top