How Does Refractive Index Variation Affect Mirage Visibility in a Desert?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quantum Sphinx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantitative Study
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem related to the behavior of light in varying refractive indices, specifically in the context of mirages in a desert environment. The problem involves a light source at a height H and a viewer at a height h, with questions addressing the minimum distance for visibility of a mirage, the distance between the viewer and the mirage, and conditions for mirage formation based on light angles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Snell's law and considers the impact of total internal reflection on their calculations. They express confusion over the results obtained and seek guidance on potential errors in their approach.
  • Some participants request the original poster to share their working to clarify the sign conventions used in their equations.
  • There is a discussion about the trajectory of light rays and the implications of the refractive index being zero at ground level, raising questions about the validity of the problem setup.
  • Participants question how horizontal distance factors into the calculations and the limits to be used in integration.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants actively engaging in clarifying the mathematical approach and addressing assumptions in the problem statement. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several lines of reasoning are being explored, particularly regarding the integration limits and the conditions for mirage formation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem implies a refractive index of zero at ground level, which raises concerns about the physical validity of the scenario. There is also an emphasis on the need to incorporate horizontal distance into the analysis.

Quantum Sphinx
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Question:[/B] Imagine you are in a massive desert. There is a tower of height H. A light source at the top of the tower can emit light in all directions. You are a person whose eyes are at a height h (h<H) above the ground. The refractive index of the air varies as μ=kd where k is a positive constant and d is the distance above the ground.

  1. What is the minimum distance at which you will still be able to see the mirage.
  2. What is the minimum possible distance between you and the mirage.
  3. If the ray starts off making an angle α below the horizontal what is the condition that a mirage is created
(The 3 questions are independent)

2. Homework Equations :
snell's law

2. The attempt at a solution
My approach:
I started off by assuming an element of height dx at an elevation x above the ground. Then I assumed that the ray of light is incident at an angle of θ and that the angle of refraction isθ+dθ. the refractive index changes from μ(x+dx) to μ(x). So,

μ(x+dx)⋅sin⁡(θ)=μ(x)⋅sin⁡(θ+dθ)

Solving this gave me weird results. I think it was because I was unable to incorporate Total Internal Reflection into it.

If somebody could either point me in the right direction for solving the question or point out an error (if there is one) in the question (because I made the question myself) then I would be grateful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantum Sphinx said:
Solving this gave me weird results.
Please post your working. It will be important to get the sign right in your first equation.

Edit: I get that the trajectory of the ray is an arc cosh function.
 
Last edited:
haruspex said:
Please post your working. It will be important to get the sign right in your first equation.

Edit: I get that the trajectory of the ray is an arc cosh function.

Like I said:
I started off by assuming an element of height dx at an elevation x above the ground. Then I assumed that the ray of light is incident at an angle of θ and that the angle of refraction isθ+dθ. the refractive index changes from μ(x+dx) to μ(x). So,

μ(x+dx)⋅sin⁡(θ)=μ(x)⋅sin⁡(θ+dθ)

That is the first equation.

Then -
μ⋅x⋅sin(θ) + μ⋅sin(θ)⋅dx = μ(x)⋅sin(θ)⋅cos(dθ) + μ(x)⋅cos(θ)⋅sin(dθ)
( assumptions - cos(dθ) = 1 and sin(dθ) = dθ )

which gives -
sin(θ)⋅dx = x⋅cos(θ)⋅dθ

dx/x = cot(θ)⋅dθ

Integrating,
[ln x] = [ ln |sin(θ)| ]

The problem comes in putting the limits. What limit should I use over [ ln |sin(θ)| ]. For question 1, the limits over [ln x] should be from H to h(I think).
 
Quantum Sphinx said:
The problem comes in putting the limits. What limit should I use over [ ln |sin(θ)| ]. For question 1, the limits over [ln x] should be from H to h(I think).
Very sorry - I was busy when I saw your reply and forgot to come back to it.

For a mirage to occur, what value of angle must be reached before what value of height?

Edit: just realized something about the problem statement. It implies the refractive index is zero at d=0. It cannot be less than 1, surely.
For the first two parts of the question, you need to look at how horizontal distance gets into the equation (x is your vertical distance).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
14K