How does rotating a coordinate system affect vector direction and components?

Click For Summary
Rotating a coordinate system by an angle theta alters the vector's components but not its physical direction, as the vector remains unchanged in space. A compass needle pointing North illustrates that while the coordinate markings may rotate, the vector's orientation stays the same. An unambiguous description of a vector requires a reference direction, but not necessarily a full coordinate system. For instance, stating "the rocket is moving with a velocity of 0.5 towards the Earth" suffices without needing a complete coordinate framework. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately describing vector behavior in different coordinate systems.
Mathematicsresear
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
If I move a coordinate system by an angle theta, why does the vector still have the same direction, but the components are different?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Because you just changed the coordinate system, you did not change anything physically. If the vector pointed towards the Moon before it will still point towards the Moon if you pick another coordinate system.
 
I had another example with a compass needle pointing North regardless of how you rotate the casing of the compass on which N-S & E-W markings are drawn, but @Orodruin got there first with his example. I should add, though, that this example shows that a coordinate system is always needed before an unambiguous description of a vector can be written down.
 
kuruman said:
I should add, though, that this example shows that a coordinate system is always needed before an unambiguous description of a vector can be written down.
This is not really true. You just need a single reference direction in which the vector is pointing. For example, "the rocket is moving with a velocity of 0.5 towards the Earth".
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
788
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K