How Does Rotor Diameter Affect Wind Power Output?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between rotor diameter and wind power output in the context of wind generation. The original poster is investigating how to calculate the necessary rotor diameter for two smaller wind generators to match the output of a larger one, given specific parameters such as rotor diameter and electrical output at a certain wind speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the relationship between rotor diameter, swept area, and power output, questioning the discrepancies in expected versus actual power outputs based on rotor size. Some participants discuss the proportional relationships involved and the implications of airflow on power generation.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the mathematical relationships and principles behind wind power generation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the proportionality of swept area to power output, and the original poster expresses appreciation for the assistance received in their calculations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of background in physics or mathematics, indicating a potential gap in understanding the underlying concepts. There is also a reference to homework guidelines regarding the placement of the question within the forum.

The Guv.
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ok, doing a project at the moment and this is one of the issues I have to overcome;

Exercise: Electricity Generation

Investigate the use of wind generation. The unit provided has a rotor diameter of 3m and an electrical output of 500W at a wind speed of 10.0m/s.

The power output of a wind generator is proportional to the cube of the wind speed.

Instead of relying on one wind generator, calculate the necessary rotor diameter if two smaller wind generators were to be used to provide the same total output.

The information I have researched is as follows:

A typical turbine with a 600 kW electrical generator will typically have a rotor diameter of some 44 metres (144 ft.). If you double the rotor diameter, you get an area which is four times larger (two squared). This means that you also get four times as much power output from the rotor.

Source: http://www.windpower.org/en/tour/wtrb/size.htm [/size]

If this is the case then a 88m diameter rotor should generate 2400kW? But the below diagram from the same page shows a 80m diameter rotor generates 2500kW!

http://www.windpower.org/res/rotorsk.gif

When I put this data into a graph I end up with a curve rather than a straight uniformed line?

http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/1328/powergraphmi7.jpg

Can anyone help me understand what I am doing wrong and guide me through what I am meant to be doing?

I'm not doing physics or maths I am doing Arch & Construction Management.

Many thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh and I don't want the answer to the given question I want the formulas involved in understanding the relationship between swept area and power generation.

Just read the sticky and I think think I need to put it in the homework bit do i?
 
You can use the statement ... "If you double the rotor diameter, you get an area which is four times larger (two squared)." This comes from the fact that the swept area is in the same ratio as the power produced due to the amount (volume per second) of air that flows through the turbine blades (if the airflow is kept constant) we have that

[tex]P \propto A[/tex]

where A is the swept area and P is the power produced. Which in the case of the problem boils down to

[tex]\frac{d_x ^2}{250} = \frac{d_{500} ^2}{500}[/tex]

The volume of air that flows through the turbine per second will be

[tex]Av[/tex]

where [tex]v[/tex] is the wind speed. A turbine converts (a fraction of) the kinetic energy of the air that flows through it to electrical energy. Which means that the power output will be (somewhat) directly proportional to this product. The reason why this will be only approximately true is that the turbine is more effective at some wind speeds due to the blade construction and orientation.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, this helped a lot with my calculations!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K