How does shaft deflection affect rotating machinery?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of shaft deflection on rotating machinery, specifically focusing on a vertical shaft that experiences deflection and dynamic behavior issues during rotation. Participants explore the causes of deflection, including static and dynamic factors, and consider the implications of shaft alignment and potential bending.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario involving a vertical shaft that is supported at one end and experiences static deflection and dynamic behavior when rotating, questioning the significance of the observed deflection.
  • Another participant suggests that if the shaft were perfectly straight, the forces would be uniform and would not cause net deflection, implying that the static deflection may contribute to dynamic issues.
  • A different participant raises the possibility that the shaft may have been slightly bent, complicating the analysis and suggesting that the observed run out could be due to this bending.
  • One participant introduces the concept of "whirling," indicating that it is a phenomenon associated with rotating shafts that can lead to failure due to vibrations, regardless of support conditions.
  • Another participant questions whether whirling occurs below the natural frequency of the shaft, noting that the shaft is rotating at a speed below its critical speed.
  • One participant acknowledges the need for further research into whirling, having initially dismissed it due to the operating speed being around 50% of critical speed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the causes of the observed deflection and dynamic behavior, with multiple competing views on the role of static deflection, potential bending of the shaft, and the implications of whirling. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact factors contributing to the issues experienced.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions regarding the straightness of the shaft, the nature of forces acting on it, and the potential for bending, indicating that these factors may influence the analysis but are not fully resolved.

Spimon
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

After a little help with some deflection caused by a rotating offset shaft.

This is the scenario.
We have a vertical shaft (165kg ~3.3m, supported at one end only) rotating at 14.67rad/s and getting some undesirable deflection and odd dynamic behaviour.

I'm trying to establish if this is caused by the shaft not being vertical before it even starts rotating. There is some static deflection (relatively small, ~2mm) and I'd like to see if this has a significant effect once it starts running.

My calculations with the actual data give a smaller than expected deflection. I'm wondering if this is my units or my process...or just not a big deflection.

My thought process.
1. Assuming the shaft itself is straight (it's been checked to within 0.05mm/m)
2. Force = mrw^2 ( mass x radius x square of angular velocity )
3. Use this force and standard beam deflection formulae to establish deflection caused by rotation.

My 'Worries'
1. There should be a force due to the modulus of elasticity in the shaft to prevent this deflection (to a point). Otherwise any deflection would accelerate and behave similar to when the rotation reaches the critical frequency. I don't know how to calculate this force.

2. Is there something else I'm missing?

3. Am I making any unfair/false assumptions?

Would you guys please take a look at my calculations in the attached pdf and see if:
a. My process is valid
b. My assumptions are fair and reasonable
c. My units are correct

Thank you all very much for any assistace!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a creative solution. If the shaft were perfectly straight, I think the forces would all be radial and uniform over the entire length of the shaft and hence no net deflection. The 2mm of static deflection may be causing your dynamic deflection. I will think about this some more...
 
The shaft could well have been slightly bent (and probably was at some stage). The run out would have been less than 1mm over the 3m length. I was just using a straight example to try to grasp the concept.
I initially figured if it was bent I could simply sub in (an approximation of) the equation of the bend to describe the radius. Maybe it's more complicated than this.

I also think it may have been bent at some stage becasue a video of this shaft seems to trace an oval shape rather than a perfect circle. I've been told this is a sign of a bent shaft but I'm unsure how to handle this mathematically.

At the end of the day I'm trying to establish the cause of the run out I'm seeing. Nothing we've tested/measured (alignment, operating speed, etc) screams out any obvious answers so now I'm testing the 'what if' scenarios (what if it was bent by 1mm/1m?).
 
The phenomenon you are encountering with this shaft layout is known as whirling. If you Google 'shaft whirling' or consult a text on shaft design, this phenomenon is covered in detail since the vibrations caused by whirling can lead to shaft failure, if not from gross overstress of the shaft, then ultimately from fatigue. Whirling can be a problem for any type of rotating machinery, regardless of how the shaft is supported.
 
Does this phenonema occur below the natural frequency? This shaft is rotating well below its natural frequency.

From what I've read so far this seems to be the same as resonance at critical speed.
 
Last edited:
Whirling occurs, like the name suggests, anytime the shaft is rotating.
 
Thanks! That's given me something to do a little research into. I'd initially discounted it as the speed is onlyl about 50% of critical speed.
I'll look into it further. Thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K