In string theory, particles is vibrating strings. However, QFT treats particles as excitations in a quantum field. Can both of these theories be correct? If so, how does them fit together?
In perturbative string theory, QFT can be viewed as an approximation of string theory. In non-perturbative string theory, there are conjectures claiming that string theory and QFT can be equivalent.
#3
Endan Rarity
7
3
Well if QFT explains quantum particles as vibrations in a field then using string theory, you can apply each vibration's frequency according to the molecules being strings?
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!