How Does String Theory Relate to Mass-Energy Equivalence?

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
I was just wondering what string theory says, if anything, about mass energy equivalence...anyone have any insights...??

For example, I was wondering if there are mathematics formulated that can transform, say, an electron form of vibration into a massless energy vibration form...or how an energy string might be transformed into matter.

While relativity doesn't say what space is, string theory offers a possible space construct as string forms...maybe in the form of branes...maybe as a one dimensional string sweeping out a two dimensional form in spacetime...so I'm wondering if string theory might have other insights on relativity.

low and behold I did not find a string theory section here...under what heading are string theory questions discussed??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Naty1 said:
low and behold I did not find a string theory section here...under what heading are string theory questions discussed??
I don't know string theory, so I will only answer this part. The answer is "Beyond the standard model".
 
E=mc^2 is a result of Special Relativity. As String Theory is fully Lorentz-invariant, i assume, the equivalence of energy and matter can be derived from String Theory as well.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top