How Does the Casimir Effect Utilize the Euler-Maclaurin Formula?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
epislon58
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
Hello,

I am attempting to repeat the math found on page 4 of this paper using the Euler-maclaurin summation formula. How would I incorporate the conversion factor because I can not figure it out for the life in me!

Thank you!

http://www.hep.caltech.edu/~phys199/lectures/lect5_6_cas.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Using the conversion factor means that we can write

$$\nu = -\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{d}{d\epsilon} e^{-\epsilon \nu}.$$

Note that I take ##\epsilon\rightarrow 0## instead of ##\infty## like in the text. I suspect the ##\infty## is a typo.

This conversion factor is useful, because we can then write the sum as

$$ \sum_{\nu = 1}^\infty \nu = -\lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{d}{d\epsilon} \sum_{\nu = 1}^\infty e^{-\epsilon \nu}.$$

Since ##e^{-\epsilon} < 1##, we can recognize this as a geometric series and do the sum. Expanding the result in ##\epsilon## will leave a divergent term, a finite term, and terms that vanish as ##\epsilon\rightarrow 0##. Introducing ## e^{-\epsilon \nu}## into the integral gives a result that cancels the divergent term in the sum. We are then left with a finite result when we compute the difference between the sum and integral.

Alternatively, one can use the Euler-Maclaurin formula, which is also referred to in the text.
 
Thank you, but the text states that they used the Euler-Macluarin and the conversion factor. Could this have been a typo?
 
epislon58 said:
Thank you, but the text states that they used the Euler-Macluarin and the conversion factor. Could this have been a typo?

You only need one of the methods. Give it a try.
 
oh ok thank you. I will let you know how it turns out asap!
 
For using the Euler-Maclaurin formula, the hint might be that you should use ##e^{-\epsilon \nu}## as a "convergence" factor (rather than a "conversion" factor). Then let ##\epsilon \rightarrow 0## (not ∞, as fzero has already noted).

Thus, consider the argument of the sum or integral to be ##\nu e^{-\epsilon \nu}##. Without the convergence factor, you run into trouble for ##\nu \rightarrow \infty## in the Euler-Maclaurin formula.