How does the density of states change with temperature?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the relationship between Fermi energy, density of states, and temperature. It highlights that Fermi energy at absolute zero is proportional to the cube root of particle density, and the density of states is derived from energy levels in a harmonic oscillator model. The participants express confusion over the role of certain factors in the density of states equation and the implications of the condition ε >> ħω. Additionally, they discuss the significant difference in Fermi energy values for atoms compared to electrons in solids, emphasizing the need for advanced cooling techniques to achieve low temperatures. The conversation concludes with inquiries about the role of degeneracy in the density of states and partition function calculations.
unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



20fwcc7.png


Part (a): Plot fermi energy as a function of N
Part (b): Derive the density of states and find its value
Part (c): How many atoms reside at 20% of fermi energy? Estimate diameter of cloud
Part (d): For the same atoms without spin, why is the cloud much smaller? Estimate the transition temperature.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Part (a)

The Fermi Energy is the highest energy level occupied by the atoms at T = 0.

We know that ##\epsilon_f \propto \left( \frac{N}{V}\right)^{\frac{2}{3}}## so the graph looks like:
29c1ma8.png


Part (b)

I'm not sure why there is a factor of ##\omega^3##, as the density of states seem to be independent:

g_{(k)} dk = (2S+1) \frac{1}{8} \times \frac{4\pi k^2 dk}{(\frac{\pi}{L})^3}
g_{(k)} dk = \frac{V}{\pi^2} k^2 dk

Using the substitution ##E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}## still doesn't produce any ##\omega## What does it mean when they say ##\epsilon >> \hbar \omega##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unscientific said:
Using the substitution ##E = \frac{\hbar^2 k^2}{2m}## still doesn't produce any ##\omega##
That equation for the energy is valid for a free particle, not for one confined to a harmonic oscillator.

unscientific said:
What does it mean when they say ##\epsilon >> \hbar \omega##?
It means you can neglect the discreteness of the energy levels and consider them to be continuously distributed.
 
DrClaude said:
That equation for the energy is valid for a free particle, not for one confined to a harmonic oscillator.It means you can neglect the discreteness of the energy levels and consider them to be continuously distributed.

Part (b)
For one confined to a harmonic oscillator, ##E = (n+\frac{1}{2})\hbar \omega##. I've been thinking what the density of states would look like in n-space. Since ##\epsilon>>\hbar \omega##, I can simply take ##\epsilon \approx n\hbar \omega##.

Would it be something like:
g_{(n)} dn = (2S+1) \frac{1}{8} \frac{4 \pi n^2 dn}{1}
g_{(\epsilon)} d\epsilon= \frac{\pi}{\hbar^3} \frac{\epsilon^2}{\omega^3} d\epsilon

Therefore ##\alpha = \frac{\pi}{\hbar^3}##.

At T = 0 K, the occupation number up till fermi energy is 1. After fermi energy, it is 0. It is a heavyside function.

N = \sum n_{(\epsilon)} = \int g_{(\epsilon)} d\epsilon
N = \int_0^{\epsilon_F}\frac{\pi}{\hbar^3} \frac{\epsilon^2}{\omega^3} d\epsilon
\epsilon_F = \hbar \omega\left(\frac{3N}{\pi}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}}

For ##N = 10^6## and ##\omega = 2\pi \times 10^5##,
\epsilon_F = 6.52 \times 10^{-27} J = 41 \space neV

Checking online, the fermi energy of Lithium is 4.7 eV. I'm off by 10 orders of magnitude..
 
Last edited:
unscientific said:
For ##N = 10^6## and ##\omega = 2\pi \times 10^5##,
\epsilon_F = 6.52 \times 10^{-27} J = 41 \space neV

Checking online, the fermi energy of Lithium is 4.7 eV. I'm off by 10 orders of magnitude..

I guess you stumbled upon the Fermi energy for electrons in solid lithium. For a degenerate Fermi gas of atoms, that's indeed the order of magnitude. The corresponding Fermi temperature is ##T_\mathrm{F} \approx 0.5\ \mathrm{mK}##, which is why advanced cooling techniques are required!
 
DrClaude said:
I guess you stumbled upon the Fermi energy for electrons in solid lithium. For a degenerate Fermi gas of atoms, that's indeed the order of magnitude. The corresponding Fermi temperature is ##T_\mathrm{F} \approx 0.5\ \mathrm{mK}##, which is why advanced cooling techniques are required!

Thanks a lot, that does make sense. Where does the degeneracy of ##\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2}## come into play here? Should it go into the density of states or the partition function?
 
Any input on whether my density of states is right?

[Edit]I'm concerned about the missing degeneracy given in the question of ##\frac{(n+1)(n+2)}{2}##
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K