How Does the Dot Product of Vector Derivatives Relate to Their Original Vectors?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the dot product of vectors and their derivatives, specifically exploring the mathematical implications of differentiating the dot product under certain conditions. Participants examine the application of the product rule in this context and the assumptions regarding the nature of the vectors involved.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the dot product of a vector 'a' and a derivative 'b' is equivalent to the negative of the derivative of 'a' and the vector 'b', leading to the equation a' ⋅ b = - a ⋅ b'.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for an independent variable with respect to which differentiation is performed, questioning the context of the derivatives.
  • Several participants mention the product rule, indicating that differentiating a ⋅ c = 0 leads to the equation a' ⋅ c + a ⋅ c' = 0, which supports the initial claim.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether the vectors are constants or functions of the same variable, suggesting that more information is needed to clarify this point.
  • Another participant argues that the additional information regarding b' = αa + βc is unnecessary for proving the main claim about a and b.
  • Concerns are raised about the application of derivatives, with one participant questioning how derivatives apply in this context without a specified independent variable.
  • It is noted that the existence of derivatives implies that the vectors must be functions of some unstated independent variable, as indicated by the notation used.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity of certain information and the assumptions regarding the vectors involved. There is no consensus on whether the vectors are constants or functions, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of the derivatives.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for clarity on the independent variable for differentiation and the relevance of certain equations to the main claim. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the assumptions underlying the mathematical relationships presented.

Tegdif
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The Dot Product of a Vector 'a' and a Derivative 'b' is the same like the negative of the Derivative 'a' and the Vector 'b'.
Summary: The Dot Product of a Vector 'a' and a Derivative 'b' is the same like the negative of the Derivative 'a' and the Vector 'b'.

Hello, I have the following Problem. The Dot Product of a Vector 'a' and a Derivative 'b' is the same like the negative of the Derivative 'a' and the Vector 'b'.
a, b, c are Vectors.
And a', b', c' are the derivative of them.

ab = a⋅c = b⋅c = 0

b' = αa + βc

a' ⋅ c = - a ⋅ c' (1)

I don't understand how you get the last Formula (1).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello teg, :welcome: !

If one can do differentiation, there must be some independent variable wrt which to differentiate. What is that in your case ?

What do you get when you diferentiate both sides of a⋅c = 0 ?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Tegdif
It's the product rule. ##\left(\mathbf{a\cdot c}\right)'= \mathbf{a}'\cdot \mathbf{c}+\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{c}'## and if the product is zero, the formula follows.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: HallsofIvy and Tegdif
Diferentiate both sides require the product rule, like Fresh_42 mentioned it.
so it should be (a⋅b)' = a'⋅c + a⋅c'. Diferentiate 0 gives me 0.
⇒ 0 = a'⋅c + a⋅c' ⇔ a'⋅c = -a⋅c'

Thank you, BvU and Fresh_42 :bow:
 
fresh_42 said:
It's the product rule. ##\left(\mathbf{a\cdot c}\right)'= \mathbf{a}'\cdot \mathbf{c}+\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{c}'## and if the product is zero, the formula follows.
But arent these vectors constants or do we assume they are both a function of the same variable t?
 
WWGD said:
But arent these vectors constants or do we assume they are both a function of the same variable t?
There isn't sufficient information. I concluded by Occam's razor: it explains what is given. The product rule is present on so many levels, that it is more than likely to be the answer.
 
Tegdif said:
Hello, I have the following Problem. The Dot Product of a Vector 'a' and a Derivative 'b' is the same like the negative of the Derivative 'a' and the Vector 'b'.
Or in symbols, a' ⋅ b = - a ⋅ b'
Tegdif said:
a, b, c are Vectors.
And a', b', c' are the derivative of them.
c and c' don't enter the picture here
Tegdif said:
ab = a⋅c = b⋅c = 0

b' = αa + βc

a' ⋅ c = - a ⋅ c' (1)

I don't understand how you get the last Formula (1).
From your problem statement, the above isn't what you needed to show, which involves only a and b and their derivatives, but doesn't involve c or its derivative.
There seems to be a lot more information here than is needed. If we get rid of all the extra stuff, we're given that a ⋅ b = 0.
Differentiate both sides of this equation and you get a' ⋅ b + a ⋅ b' = 0, by using the product rule, as mentioned by other posters. From there, isolate a ⋅ b'.

I don't see the purpose of including this: b' = αa + βc. It doesn't have any bearing on what you're trying to prove, as far as I can see.
 
Mark44 said:
Or in symbols, a' ⋅ b = - a ⋅ b'
c and c' don't enter the picture here
From your problem statement, the above isn't what you needed to show, which involves only a and b and their derivatives, but doesn't involve c or its derivative.
There seems to be a lot more information here than is needed. If we get rid of all the extra stuff, we're given that a ⋅ b = 0.
Differentiate both sides of this equation and you get a' ⋅ b + a ⋅ b' = 0, by using the product rule, as mentioned by other posters. From there, isolate a ⋅ b'.

I don't see the purpose of including this: b' = αa + βc. It doesn't have any bearing on what you're trying to prove, as far as I can see.
Derivative with respect to what? A derivative is a concept that applies to functions. How is this the case here?
 
WWGD said:
Derivative with respect to what? A derivative is a concept that applies to functions. How is this the case here?
Based on the initial post, we are given the existence of derivatives.
Tegdif said:
a, b, c are Vectors.
And a', b', c' are the derivative of them.
We can infer that these vectors are all functions of some unstated independent variable, and since the derivatives exist, these must be differentiable functions of that variable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003 and fresh_42

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K