How Does the Fourier Transform Relate to Derivatives in Signal Processing?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Fourier Transform and derivatives in signal processing, specifically how derivatives are represented in the transform domain. Participants express confusion over the mathematical transformations and the notation used, particularly regarding the relationship between functions of x and ω. Key equations are provided to illustrate the relationships between the original function and its Fourier Transform, highlighting how derivatives correspond to multiplication by iω in the frequency domain. Clarifications emphasize the importance of correctly interpreting these transformations to avoid misunderstandings. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately applying Fourier analysis in signal processing.
nhrock3
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
cant understand this transformation
i know that each derivative pops iw
and
\hat{y}' ->-ixy(x)
\hat{y}'(\omega) ->-ixy(x)
x is a signs of derivative

but i don't know how its been done in here
-ixy'(x)=(i\omega \hat{y}(w))'
how they decided that is the derivative of this whole expression
muliplying by x means derivative
but here it something else
<br /> f[xy&#039;(\omega )]=i\frac{\mathrm{d} }{\mathrm{d} \omega}f[y&#039;(x)]=i(i\omega \hat{y}(\omega))&#039;=i(i \hat{y}(\omega)+i\omega \hat{y}&#039;(\omega))
i can't see what laws they follow here
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nhrock3 said:
cant understand this transformation
i know that each derivative pops iw
and
\hat{y}&#039; -&gt;-ixy(x)
\hat{y}&#039;(\omega) -&gt;-ixy(x)
x is a signs of derivative

but i don't know how its been done in here
-ixy&#039;(x)=(i\omega \hat{y}(w))&#039;
how they decided that is the derivative of this whole expression
muliplying by x means derivative
but here it something else

I think you need to be more careful about the relation between derivatives and transforms. That last equation doesn't make any sense as it is written because you have a function of x = a function of omega. I also don't think it is transcribed correctly. You must mean one is the transform of the other.

Using the hat notation for the transform you have the following three relationships between transforms and derivatives:

y(x) \leftrightarrows \hat y(\omega)

-ixy(x) \leftrightarrows \hat y&#039;(\omega)

y&#039;(x) \leftrightarrows i\omega \hat y(\omega)

To get your identity you start with the second one above:

-ixy(x) \leftrightarrows \hat y&#039;(\omega)

Now apply the third one to this last one by multiplying the right side by i\omega:

(-ixy(x))&#039; \leftrightarrows i\omega \hat y&#039;(\omega)

Maybe that will help you.

[Edit - added later]

Here's your identity:

Start with 3:

y&#039;(x) \leftrightarrows i\omega \hat y(\omega)

Now multiply the left side by -ix and apply the second one at the top:

-ixy&#039;(x) \leftrightarrows (i\omega \hat y(\omega))&#039;
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K