How Does the Imaginary Part of a Holomorphic Function Relate to the Real Part?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cheeez
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Behavior Imaginary
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the real and imaginary parts of holomorphic functions, particularly in the context of boundedness and the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations. Participants explore theoretical aspects, examples, and implications in complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the behavior of the imaginary part of a holomorphic function in relation to the real part, particularly under conditions of boundedness.
  • One participant references the Cauchy-Riemann equations, suggesting that if the real part is bounded, the imaginary part must either be constant or unbounded.
  • Another participant challenges this by citing examples of holomorphic functions like sin(z) and cos(z), noting that they are not constant but are also not bounded.
  • There is a discussion about a theorem stating that the real part of an analytic function is uniquely determined by its imaginary part, up to an additive constant.
  • A participant presents a problem from a complex analysis paper regarding the boundedness of the real part of an analytic function and questions whether this implies the constancy of the function.
  • Another participant suggests that exponentiating the function could lead to a conclusion about its constancy, referencing Liouville's theorem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of boundedness for the imaginary part of holomorphic functions, with some agreeing on the role of the Cauchy-Riemann equations while others provide counterexamples. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of these relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is contingent on the definitions of boundedness and the specific conditions under which theorems apply, particularly in relation to the behavior of holomorphic functions.

cheeez
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
does the behavior the imaginary part behave in anyway similar to the real part of a holomorphic function. say if the real part if bounded or positive, what can you conclude about the imaginary part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Cauchy-Riemann equations relate the real and imaginary parts of holomorphic functions.

Since the only bounded holomorphic functions are the constants, If the real part of a holomorphic function is bounded, then either it and the imaginary part are constants or the imaginary part cannot be bounded.
 
so what about sinz or cos those aren't constant but clearly holomorphic right'
 
They also are not bounded!

[tex]cos(z)= \frac{e^{iz}+ e^{-iz}}{2}[/tex]

If z is imaginary, say, z= ix, then
[tex]sin(ix)= \frac{e^{-x}+ e^{x}}{2}= -cosh(x)[/tex]
which is not bounded.
 
An easy corollary of the Cauchy-Riemann equations is the following:

A complex differentiable function which takes on purely real (or purely imaginary) values is locally constant.

From this we obtain the following interesting theorem:

The real part of a function which is analytic in a connected open set is uniquely determined by it's imaginary part, up to an additive constant.

This is probably something which you are looking for?
 
HallsofIvy said:
They also are not bounded!

[tex]cos(z)= \frac{e^{iz}+ e^{-iz}}{2}[/tex]

If z is imaginary, say, z= ix, then
[tex]sin(ix)= \frac{e^{-x}+ e^{x}}{2}= -cosh(x)[/tex]
which is not bounded.

doh I am still not used to thinking in complex

@micromass that's very helpful
 
I am looking at a past complex analysis paper and the following question comes up:

Let [tex]M\in\mathbb{R},f:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C}[/tex] where [tex]f[/tex] is analytic on [tex]\mathbb{C}[/tex]. Suppose for all [tex]z\in\mathbb{C}[/tex] we have that [tex]Re(f(z))\leq M[/tex]. Show that [tex]f[/tex] is constant.

Can this just be solved by pointing out that the imaginary part is determined by the real part plus or minus some constant, and therefore the imaginary part is also bounded so by Liouville's theorem f is bounded?
 
The trick is to exponentiate. [tex]e^f[/tex] is analytic and bounded, hence is constant. Thus f is constant.

Tricky business.
 
Hahaha, someone made a user account just to reply to a post made a month ago.

Tricky business
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K