How does the physics of a rubber band plane affect its flight?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of rubber band planes, specifically addressing why these planes do not exhibit significant rotational motion opposite to the propeller's direction when the rubber band unwinds. The primary reason is the greater moment of inertia of the plane compared to the propeller, resulting in minimal visible rotation. Additionally, the design of real aircraft incorporates features such as wing dihedral and engine configurations to counteract torque, which is less critical in the simpler design of rubber band planes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia in physics
  • Basic principles of aerodynamics
  • Knowledge of propeller mechanics
  • Familiarity with aircraft design features like dihedral angle
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of moment of inertia and its impact on flight dynamics
  • Explore the effects of dihedral angle on aircraft stability
  • Learn about torque and counter-torque mechanisms in multi-engine aircraft
  • Investigate the role of propwash in aircraft control and stability
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, hobbyists building rubber band planes, and anyone interested in the mechanics of flight and aircraft design.

zerow333
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am working on a rubber band plane (something like this: http://www.instructables.com/id/Rubber-Band-Powered-Aeroplane/) and I got a question regarding to the physics on these plane. As there is only one propeller and one rubber band, when the rubber band untwist, why doesn’t it rotate the aircraft in the opposite direction of the propeller? Is it because of the moment of inertia of the plane is much larger than the propeller so the resistant is much greater, hence only a minimal rotation that is not really visible to our eyes? But then why real plane need to counteract this torque but these rubber band plane don’t?

Many thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the plane is perfectly symmetrical, you should see the body of the plane rotate in the opposite direction of the propeller rotation. As you suspected, it will be less, because of the greater moment of inertia. The wings could be adjusted so that one side deflects the air a little more than the other side, which would create a torque, pushing against ts tendency to rotate. For a single engine aircraft, that is my guess as to the way it is done. With an even number of engines, half of the engines could run clockwise, and the other half run counterclockwise.
 
The moment of inertia of the wings helps somewhat, but there's still some roll response. The roll response is taken care of by dihedral in the wings, that produce a counter torque when the plane's wings are not horizontal (or whenever there's a crosswind component). The combination could result in a mild turn, but weather vane effect from the vertical stabilizer would reduce the turn. The spiraling component of propwash on the wings and vertical stabilizer also reduce roll response (there may be a yaw response to high power at low speed).
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K