How does the speed of light always appear constant?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the constancy of the speed of light across different reference frames, exploring implications of special relativity, time dilation, and the behavior of light as observed by moving and stationary observers. Participants examine the nuances of relativistic effects and the challenges in understanding these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question what happens when a person moving at 90% the speed of light shines a light forward, wondering how this relates to the observations of stationary observers.
  • One participant asserts that both the moving observer and the stationary observer will see the light moving away at the speed of light, emphasizing that special relativity dictates this constancy regardless of the observer's frame.
  • Another participant notes that the addition of velocities works differently at relativistic speeds compared to everyday speeds, suggesting that simple addition does not apply when approaching the speed of light.
  • There is a suggestion that the differences in time perception between moving and stationary observers may relate to Lorentz contraction, although this is described as potentially circular reasoning.
  • A participant recommends using the relativistic velocity addition formula to clarify these concepts through examples.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the implications of special relativity, particularly concerning time dilation and the behavior of light. There is no consensus on the explanations provided, and some participants acknowledge confusion regarding the relationship between gravity and relativistic effects.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about Lorentz transformations and the implications of relativistic effects, indicating a need for clearer examples and explanations. The discussion reflects a mix of foundational concepts and advanced interpretations, with some assumptions left unexamined.

cmurray
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Two things -- 1:

So if the speed of light is a constant and never changes, no matter what reference frame you're in - then what happens if a person is moving forward at 90% the speed of light and shines a light in the direction of motion?

Perhaps I have it all mixed up, but to that person light appear to be going 186,000 mi/s forward. What then would a stationary observer to the side see?

A person in a car going 50mph throws a ball forward at 10 mph - the person in the car sees it as moving 10mph forward, a person outside sees it at 60mph. But if light can't appear to be going faster than c, does that just mean the distance appears to be much shorter or what? I'm pretty shaky on the explanation of Lorentz transformations, and who knows I may have just confused myself to the point I'm not making sense...

2:

Is the reason that a stationary observer views time differently than a fast moving observer because the fast moving observer is creating a pseudo gravitational force which bends light? Or am I again muddling different theories together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cmurray said:
Two things -- 1:

So if the speed of light is a constant and never changes, no matter what reference frame you're in - then what happens if a person is moving forward at 90% the speed of light and shines a light in the direction of motion?

They'll see the light moving away from them at the speed of light.

Perhaps I have it all mixed up, but to that person light appear to be going 186,000 mi/s forward. What then would a stationary observer to the side see?

They would also see the light move away at the speed of light. Special relativity means that light always travels at the speed of light relative to any observer. It doesn't matter what reference frame you're in, so long as you're not in the reference frame of the light wave itself; you'll always see light, at least light in a vacuum, moving at the speed of light c.

A person in a car going 50mph throws a ball forward at 10 mph - the person in the car sees it as moving 10mph forward, a person outside sees it at 60mph. But if light can't appear to be going faster than c, does that just mean the distance appears to be much shorter or what? I'm pretty shaky on the explanation of Lorentz transformations, and who knows I may have just confused myself to the point I'm not making sense...

The person outside sees it moving at approximately 60 MPH. In actuality it's not exactly 60 MPH but a simple addition of velocities is sufficient for speeds as low as these. It is incorrect to assume this is true at speeds on the order of c, though. You cannot just add velocities then.

2:

Is the reason that a stationary observer views time differently than a fast moving observer because the fast moving observer is creating a pseudo gravitational force which bends light? Or am I again muddling different theories together?

Yes, you are muddling. Special relativity says nothing much about the gravitational force, that's all in general relativity. I wouldn't say that there's a "reason" that this occurs, it's one of those things that just "is." One way to describe is to say that because of the Lorentz contraction, someone traveling faster measures a "meter" to be shorter than what someone who is stationary measures it to be, so they cover that meter in a different amount of time. But that's really just circular, one could also say that the reason one measures a meter differently is because time is affected by how fast you're going.
 
cmurray said:
So if the speed of light is a constant and never changes, no matter what reference frame you're in - then what happens if a person is moving forward at 90% the speed of light and shines a light in the direction of motion?
The highly-abridged answer that you're looking for is that two people moving with respect to reach other at 90% of the speed of light each experience time differently. It is this time dilation of their reference frame that allows them both to observe the beam of light traveling at c. Read the links above for a more comprehensive explanation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
741
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K