How does the train scene in The Wolverine break physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The train scene in "The Wolverine" violates fundamental physics principles, particularly regarding momentum and gravity. Wolverine's jump off the train results in an unrealistic rearward trajectory, contradicting the laws of motion. The discussion highlights that while high-speed trains could theoretically allow for aerodynamic effects, the scene's portrayal lacks scientific accuracy, making it implausible. The need for proper phrasing in physics-related questions is also emphasized.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts such as momentum and gravity
  • Familiarity with vector analysis in motion
  • Knowledge of aerodynamics principles
  • Ability to apply equations of motion in practical scenarios
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of momentum in physics
  • Study vector analysis and its application in motion
  • Learn about aerodynamics and its effects on high-speed objects
  • Explore equations of motion and their relevance in real-world scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physics enthusiasts, film analysts, and anyone interested in the scientific accuracy of action sequences in movies.

mrspock
Messages
12
Reaction score
0


I think it may have something to do with momentum or vectors, but I'm not sure? Can you explain to me why Wolverine jumping off the train and then flying several feet backwards in a perfect straight line is unrealistic?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That's the part that you find unbelievable?
 
Danger said:
That's the part that you find unbelievable?

Well the whole scene kinda breaks physics in general, but I have to prove why it's unrealistic with equations / calculations.
 
Okay. I'm not going to get into it, but at least phrase the question properly. That jump is rearward, not forward.

edit: I see that you edited your first post to correct that. Good move.
 
Last edited:
mrspock said:
Can you explain to me why Wolverine jumping off the train and then flying several feet backwards in a perfect straight line is unrealistic?
Because gravity. But if the train is fast enough, he might use aerodynamics to fly a path significantly flatter than a purely ballistic one.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad Something about a fly and a train though experiment
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
I need help, please, designing a pool sensor for breaking . . .
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
639
Show that the flywheel inside the train counteracts lean in a curve
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is the Physics in the Avengers' Shield Collision Scene Accurate?
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Undergrad What is the Effect of Gravity on Einstein's Train in Special Relativity?
  • · Replies 219 ·
8
Replies
219
Views
16K
Incorrect Physics in Furious 7 Car Tower Scene
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
Undergrad How deep does it need to go for a physics theory to be consistent?
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
High School Airplanes Landing & Altitude Problem
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Relational event horizons?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
566
Graduate Optimizing High Speed Transit for Comfort and Safety: A Scientific Approach
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K