How does the Venturi effect work in a Geyser Water Cannon toy?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gloo68
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cannon Pressure Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Geyser Water Cannon operates based on the Venturi effect, utilizing a two-foot cone that narrows from a one-foot diameter to one inch. When the cone is submerged in water and pushed down, it creates a pressure differential that propels water upwards, achieving heights of up to 30 feet. The discussion clarifies that the Venturi effect involves an increase in fluid velocity and a decrease in pressure as water moves through a constriction, aligning with the principles of fluid dynamics. Users also explore the relationship between cone design and pressure output, suggesting that a narrower taper can increase pressure significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Venturi effect in fluid dynamics
  • Basic principles of pressure and fluid flow
  • Familiarity with the concept of continuity in fluid mechanics
  • Knowledge of pressure measurement units, such as kilopascals (Kpa)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of fluid dynamics, focusing on the Venturi effect
  • Explore the relationship between pressure and fluid velocity in constricted flows
  • Investigate how design modifications affect pressure output in fluid systems
  • Learn about practical applications of the Venturi effect in various devices
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the mechanics of fluid dynamics, particularly in relation to toys and practical applications of the Venturi effect.

gloo68
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I have this toy I bought for my daughter. It is called a Geyser Water Cannon and supposedly it works using the Venturi effect. Basically it's a 2 foot cone that starts out with a wide diameter (1 foot) and narrows to about 1 inch - with openings on each end. When you pull down or push down this cone on a surface of water - it can shoot water up to 30 feet.

I am all confused by this talk of the Venturi effect as water travels from a wide volume to a narrow one.

Questions:
1. Is the water shooting higher not created because I am pushing and concentrating water up a narrow channel and thus the pressure created shoots the water higher??

2. Doesn't a syringe work in the same way with the opening being smaller in diameter than the barrel of a syringe? And thus the stream shoots higher because of pressure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think it's the Venturi effect. That has to do with a reduction in static pressure when a fluid passes through a constriction.

From the wiki article on the venturi effect: According to the laws governing fluid dynamics, a fluid's velocity must increase as it passes through a constriction to satisfy the principle of continuity, while its pressure must decrease to satisfy the principle of conservation of mechanical energy.

It looks to me like it's simply a result of the principle of continuity. So I think the answer to both of your questions is, yes.

If this isn't right someone correct me.
 
Here is an advertisement for the "Geyser Water Canon" with a photo of the device, plus many comments from users. This may help others describe the principle of operation.

http://www.yoyo.com/p/geyser-guys-geyser-gusher-water-cannon-colors-may-vary-354192
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@ Drakkith - thanks so much for the reply.

So the next query is, Given a set force and size of the cone (volume wise), we can can actually increase the pressure to almost any reasonable pressure (i.e. 500 Kpa?) by just making the tappering part more narrow and/or make the opening smaller correct?
 
gloo68 said:
@ Drakkith - thanks so much for the reply.

So the next query is, Given a set force and size of the cone (volume wise), we can can actually increase the pressure to almost any reasonable pressure (i.e. 500 Kpa?) by just making the tappering part more narrow and/or make the opening smaller correct?

I want to say yes, as that would make sense to me, but I have no formal physics education so I can't be sure.
 
Drakkith said:
I want to say yes, as that would make sense to me, but I have no formal physics education so I can't be sure.

@ Drakkith - ok thanks for your efforts.

If anyone else has thoughts on this I would appreciate. Thank you in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
10K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K