How does the world look like after a Lorentz transformation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how the world appears to a moving observer in the context of Special Relativity, particularly in comparison to an observer at rest. Participants explore various aspects of visual perception, Lorentz transformations, and the implications of relative motion on observation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a desire for a detailed description of how a moving observer perceives the world differently from a stationary observer, seeking references and visual examples.
  • One participant asserts that a Lorentz transformation does not affect what any observer sees, emphasizing that it changes the coordinates of events, which are not accessible to observers.
  • Another participant suggests that while Lorentz contraction may occur at high speeds, it is contingent on relative motion, and one would not perceive a meter stick as shorter while running with it.
  • There are claims that visual effects such as blue shift and red shift occur as observers approach or pass each other, complicating the relationship between Lorentz transformations and visual perception.
  • Some participants argue that Lorentz transformations do affect what an observer sees, particularly in terms of the motion of objects relative to the observer before and after a boost.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of explanations provided to the original poster, who may not fully grasp Special Relativity, leading to a debate on the appropriateness of simplifying complex concepts.
  • One participant mentions that Special Relativity does not account for the nuances of human perception, such as the role of the eye and memory in visual experience.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether Lorentz transformations affect visual perception. Some maintain that they do not, while others argue that they do influence what an observer sees. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the relationship between Lorentz transformations and visual perception is complex, involving factors like relative speeds, Doppler effects, and the nature of measurements in different inertial reference frames (IRFs). There is also mention of the limitations in understanding how these transformations manifest in everyday visual experiences.

nick41
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I would like to get a detailed description, how the world looks for a moving observer in Special Relativity compared to the way it looks for an observer at rest. Do you know any reference, where I can find such a description? Can you maybe even tell me, where to find two pictures of the sights of both observers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nick41 said:
I would like to get a detailed description, how the world looks for a moving observer in Special Relativity compared to the way it looks for an observer at rest. Do you know any reference, where I can find such a description? Can you maybe even tell me, where to find two pictures of the sights of both observers?
A Lorentz Transformation does not in any way affect what any observer sees.
 
nick41 said:
I would like to get a detailed description, how the world looks for a moving observer in Special Relativity compared to the way it looks for an observer at rest. Do you know any reference, where I can find such a description? Can you maybe even tell me, where to find two pictures of the sights of both observers?


Oh Compared to, yes of course.
[/PLAIN]
Plenty of examples.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
nick41 said:
I would like to get a detailed description, how the world looks for a moving observer in Special Relativity compared to the way it looks for an observer at rest. Do you know any reference, where I can find such a description? Can you maybe even tell me, where to find two pictures of the sights of both observers?

Go for a jog, and look at things around you. You've applied a lorentz transformation to yourself and you can see how it looks different. ;)

At faster speeds, things might look shorter in the direction of travel, because they are lorentz contracted. But note that only relative speeds matter, if you start running with a meter stick in your hand it won't look any shorter.
 
DimReg said:
Go for a jog, and look at things around you. You've applied a lorentz transformation to yourself and you can see how it looks different. ;)
Where is the Lorentz Transformation in this scenario? Remember, a Lorentz Transformation changes the coordinates of events which is information not available to any observer and doesn't in any way affect what an observer sees.
DimReg said:
At faster speeds, things might look shorter in the direction of travel, because they are lorentz contracted. But note that only relative speeds matter, if you start running with a meter stick in your hand it won't look any shorter.
You won't necessarily see things looking shorter just because there is a fast relative speed between you and the object. The images of objects get blue shifted as you/they approach each other and change to red shifted as you/they pass each other but the visual shapes of objects is a very complicated subject and has nothing to do with a Lorentz Transformation.
 
ghwellsjr said:
Where is the Lorentz Transformation in this scenario? Remember, a Lorentz Transformation changes the coordinates of events which is information not available to any observer and doesn't in any way affect what an observer sees.

You won't necessarily see things looking shorter just because there is a fast relative speed between you and the object. The images of objects get blue shifted as you/they approach each other and change to red shifted as you/they pass each other but the visual shapes of objects is a very complicated subject and has nothing to do with a Lorentz Transformation.

The lorentz transformation is a boost... You start out not running, then later you are. I thought that was clear. And yes it does affect what an observer sees: before the boost some things will be at rest, and after they will be moving. While the coordinate aspect of lorentz transformations is not measurable, non lorentz invariant quantities (such as energy) do change under lorentz transformations, so you can't claim that lorentz tranformations don't affect what an observer sees.

Ok, I did say that you "might" see things get shorter. Judging by the question of the OP, I don't think he's completely comfortable with special relativity, so I don't see the point in making my answer as complicated as possible. I tried to give a simple version of what goes on, and not bother the OP with issues like red shift and blue shift, so he can focus on what he want to know.

My point about going for a jog wasn't that you'd notice lorentz contraction, but that there is nothing unusual about lorentz transformations, and they don't change the way the world looks in an exotic way.
 
DimReg said:
The lorentz transformation is a boost... You start out not running, then later you are. I thought that was clear. And yes it does affect what an observer sees: before the boost some things will be at rest, and after they will be moving.
Before and after the boost, different things are at rest and different things are moving according to the IRF but relative speeds between objects remain the same in all IRF's. Therefore, what an observer sees is not affected by transforming to a different IRF.
DimReg said:
While the coordinate aspect of lorentz transformations is not measurable, non lorentz invariant quantities (such as energy) do change under lorentz transformations, so you can't claim that lorentz tranformations don't affect what an observer sees.
No Lorentz variant quantity is in any way visible to any observer. And any measurement or derived calculation that any observer determines for these Lorentz variant quantities come out the same for him when you transform to a different IRF.
DimReg said:
Ok, I did say that you "might" see things get shorter. Judging by the question of the OP, I don't think he's completely comfortable with special relativity, so I don't see the point in making my answer as complicated as possible. I tried to give a simple version of what goes on, and not bother the OP with issues like red shift and blue shift, so he can focus on what he want to know.
Unfortunately, when an OP who is uncomfortable with Special Relativity asks a confusing or disjointed question, it is impossible to determine what he wants to know. But that is not an excuse to give him wrong information. It's wrong to tell him that a Lorentz Transformation changes what he sees, measures or determines.
DimReg said:
My point about going for a jog wasn't that you'd notice lorentz contraction, but that there is nothing unusual about lorentz transformations, and they don't change the way the world looks in an exotic way.
They don't change the way the world looks to any observer in any way. That's the whole point of Special Relativity, all IRF's are equally valid, none is preferred.
 
Last edited:
Also, SR doesn't account for an eyeball & memory, or it being a continuum.

I don't know SR well enough to envision all comparative situations.

But, Doppler is easy enough to visualize.

And there is even that MIT game A Slower Speed of Light.

(assuming this thread is about the visual relativistic effects as seen in the game)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K