How Does Your Weight Change from the Poles to the Equator?

AI Thread Summary
Weight varies between the poles and the equator due to the Earth's shape and rotation. An 80 kg mass would weigh less at the equator, where the centrifugal effect from Earth's spin slightly counteracts gravity, compared to the poles. The local gravitational acceleration, "g," is approximately 9.789 m·s−2 at the equator and 9.832 m·s−2 at the poles. Additionally, the Earth's equatorial bulge and density variations contribute to these differences in gravitational pull. Understanding these factors is essential for accurately calculating weight changes across different latitudes.
georgert
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
If I have a mass of 80 kg, what would the difference in my weight be at either the North or South Pole and at the equator? It would seem to me that the spin of the Earth would induce a centrifugal effect that would counter somewhat Earth's gravitational pull at the equator, but not do so at Earth's axis of spin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
georgert said:
If I have a mass of 80 kg, what would the difference in my weight be at either the North or South Pole and at the equator? It would seem to me that the spin of the Earth would induce a centrifugal effect that would counter somewhat Earth's gravitational pull at the equator, but not do so at Earth's axis of spin.
That's absolutely correct.
The effects of having an equatorial bulge and flattened poles also contributes to variation of the local value of "g", compared to what you'd get by a strictly spherical shape.
"g" is also slightly dependent upon density variations.


According to Wikipedia, the local values of "g" are as follows:
local gravity, g, increases from 9.789 m·s−2 at the equator to 9.832 m·s−2 at the poles.[1]
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top