How easy is it to ionize Nitrogen or oxygen with beta rays?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the possibility of ionizing nitrogen and oxygen using beta rays, particularly in relation to their behavior in ionization tubes and their potential to glow like noble gases. Participants consider the stability of these gases when ionized and the conditions required for maintaining an excited state.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether oxygen or nitrogen can glow in a closed environment or in the open, suggesting that these gases may become unstable when ionized and react quickly to regain stability.
  • Another participant asserts that ionized oxygen would be highly reactive, particularly with metal electrodes, and raises concerns about the degradation of materials in ionization tubes.
  • A different participant notes that while oxygen reacts with metal, air is commonly used in ionization chambers, and some chambers may be open to the atmosphere.
  • Participants discuss the use of noble gases in ionization chambers, mentioning that argon is frequently used, and elaborate on the role of quench gases in mitigating issues related to gas de-excitation and secondary ionization.
  • There is mention of the complexities involved in using different fill gases for specific detection purposes, including the potential for spurious pulses in proportional counters due to photon emissions from excited gas molecules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of ionizing nitrogen and oxygen and maintaining their excited states. There is no consensus on the specific conditions or power requirements needed for such ionization.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the reactivity of ionized gases, the degradation of materials in ionization tubes, and the specific applications of different fill gases in radiation detectors. The discussion reflects a range of assumptions about the behavior of gases under ionization.

joknhial
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello, over the past few days I've been looking at glowing ionization tubes on YouTube. there seems to be this innate correlation and association between ionization chambers and noble gasses, like xenon, argon and neon. i was wondering is it possible for oxygen or nitrogen to glow like them ?, both in a closed environment (tube), and in the open?. The only plausible explanation i can think of is that oxygen and nitrogen become unstable when stripped of electrons and will therefore quickly react with other nitrogen or oxygen atoms to regain that stable configuration. however is it possible to ionize them and maintain that glowing excited state? which are commonly seen in auroras. if so how much power is required, in terms of Mev or Ev classification?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
yes.
 
Ionized Oxygen would be aggresively reactive with just about anything except noble gases.
Probably the tube electrodes either a metal/alloy or Carbon would oxidise and break down quickly.
Possibly even the glass tube could break down eventually even if given a durable electrode material.
 
Last edited:
Oxygen would indeed react with the metal electrodes, but air is apparently common in ionization chambers. Normally ionization detectors contain argon, although some might contain air if they are for low activities. Some ionization chambers may be open to the air/atmosphere, while others are sealed in which case they like contain gases like Ar.

I remember using Ar or Ar-CH4 (so-called P10 gas) and BF3 detectors, with the latter being sensitive to neutrons.

Some examples of Ar-filled detectors.
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/ionchamber/carmichaelhipressure.htm
http://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/ionchamber/RS 111 Prototype.htm

This document gives some insight into gas-filled radiation detectors, including ionization chambers, GM and proportional counters, and fill gases.
https://www.science.mcmaster.ca/medphys/images/files/courses/4R06/4R6Notes3_GasFilled_Detectors.pdf
See 3.2 Proportional counters - the last 2 pages of Section B.
A problem with some fill gases is that photons can be created by gas de-excitation. Gas
multiplication is based on secondary ionization. In addition, however, collisions may
occur where the gas molecule is raised to an excited state but not ionized, so secondary
electrons are not created. There is no contribution of this molecule to the avalanche; it
decays by photon emission. The photons can create ionization elsewhere in the fill gas by
interacting with less tightly bound electrons or interacting by the photoelectric effect in
the counter wall. In proportional counters this creates spurious pulses and/or loss of
proportionality. To reduce this effect QUENCH gases are added. These are polyatomic
gases that will preferentially absorb the photons. Often this quench gas is methane.

The type of fill gas used is dependent on the function the counter is to perform.
Commonly used gases for β measurements are the noble gases. These often require a
quench gas however. Cost dictates that argon is commonly used, usually as a mixture of
90% argon with 10% methane. This is called P-10 gas. For better γ-ray detection the fill
gas is switched to krypton or xenon.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: joknhial

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K