How exactly does a dynamicist define deceleration in this case?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gikiian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deceleration
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
gikiian
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Hey friends. I wanted to know how exactly would a dynamicist define deceleration of a car on a road with humps and dips. Actually I always thought that deceleration of car on the road will be the vector a (see the diagram), however, in a sample problem in my dynamics book, it the car's deceleration is taken as the vector a_t (see the diagram), but it is not explicitly mentioned to be the tangential component. So how do we differentiate between the two cases?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.3 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
First off, dynamicists usually speak in terms of acceleration, rather than deceleration.

You question seems to revolve around whether the term refers to the tangential component or the total vector. Unless otherwise specified, I would usually assume that the total vector is implied, but anytime there seems to be confusion, the only option is to ask for clarification.
 
I believe what you're saying is correct. Thanks!