How exactly does a gyroscope relate to angular momentum?

Click For Summary
A gyroscope operates on the principle of angular momentum conservation, but this conservation only applies when no torque is acting on it. In the case of gyroscopic precession, a torque is applied, leading to a change in angular momentum rather than its conservation. The precession occurs because the gyroscope wheel responds to this torque, which is influenced by gravity. Unlike demonstrations involving turntables, which illustrate conservation of angular momentum in a closed system, gyroscopic precession highlights the dynamics of changing angular momentum due to external forces. Understanding these mechanics is crucial for accurately explaining gyroscopic behavior in reports.
omgwtfitsp
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Wikipedia says that a gyroscope is based on the conservation of angular momentum. This whole day I'v been doing my report on gyroscopes and explaining their precession. But how do I connect the conservation of angular momentum to this? I don't know where to start.

I have seen videos demonstrating the conservation of angular momentum as people stand on turn tables with a spinning wheel, and as they turn the wheel, the wheel is resisting its change in orientation of its axle and will cause you to turn in the opposite direction to conserve angular momentum.

But how do I put this in terms of the gyroscope? Like, when the gyroscope is precessing, is it experiencing angular momentum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How were you "explaining" precession without referring to angular momentum?

The precession happens because there is a torque on the body (from gravity, draw it). And a torque produces a change in angular momentum (similar to F=dp/dt but for rotation). It works using the right hand rule if you use classical coordinates.
 
omgwtfitsp said:
Wikipedia says that a gyroscope is based on the conservation of angular momentum. This whole day I'v been doing my report on gyroscopes and explaining their precession. But how do I connect the conservation of angular momentum to this?


You are asking specifically about gyroscopic precession. As all sources mention, to have a state of gyroscopic precession the gyroscope wheel must be subject to a torque.

There is only one case where the angular momentum of the gyroscope wheel is conserved: when there is no torque. To avoid a torque on the gyroscope wheel you set up a gimbal mounting. The gimbal mounted gyroscope maintains the same orientation in space.

The angular momentum of a gyroscope in gyroscopic precession is not conserved. The angular momentum is changing all the time, due to the torque that is exerted.



To understand the mechanics of gyroscopic precession you need to be aware of how spinning objects respond to a torque that is applied on them.
That is, gyroscopic precession is all about change of angular momentum of the gyroscope wheel, rather than about conservation of angular momentum.

Let me refer you to an earlier discussion (by me) on physicsforums:
A post from november 2010 about https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=2992527&postcount=3". Illustrated with images. Just a qualitative discussion.

More detailed discussion (including math) is in the http://www.cleonis.nl/physics/phys256/gyroscope_physics.php" article on my website.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
omgwtfitsp said:
I have seen videos demonstrating the conservation of angular momentum as people stand on turn tables with a spinning wheel, and as they turn the wheel, the wheel is resisting its change in orientation of its axle and will cause you to turn in the opposite direction to conserve angular momentum.

In the demonstration you refer to there is conservation of angular momentum of the setup as a whole: the turntable, the person on that turntable, the spinning wheel in the demonstrator's hands.

A turntable setup like that is not the same case as gyroscopic precession. The turntable demonstrations do not offer clues to help understanding what is going on in the case of gyroscopic precession.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
776
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
641
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K