How Fast Do EM Waves Travel in Ferromagnetic Materials?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The speed of electromagnetic (EM) waves in insulating ferromagnetic materials can be calculated using the formula v = (sqrt(μ₀μᵣε₀εᵣ))⁻¹. In this discussion, a participant initially misinterpreted the parameters, leading to an incorrect speed of 0.01 m/s. However, upon correctly applying the values for relative permeability (μᵣ = 1000) and permittivity (εᵣ = 10), the speed was recalculated to approximately 2.99 x 10⁶ m/s, which aligns with typical speeds for ferrites. The lecturer confirmed that the initial problem contained a mistake.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with the concepts of permeability (μ) and permittivity (ε)
  • Knowledge of the formula v = (sqrt(μ₀μᵣε₀εᵣ))⁻¹
  • Basic grasp of ferromagnetic materials and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of ferrites and their typical electromagnetic wave speeds
  • Study the implications of varying permittivity and permeability on wave propagation
  • Explore the concept of de Broglie wavelength and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Examine real-world applications of EM wave propagation in ferromagnetic materials
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physicists interested in wave propagation in materials, and educators looking for examples of theoretical physics problems.

FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


An EM wave with frequency 87Mhz travels in an insulating ferromagnetic material with \mu_0 \mu_r = 1000 and \epsilon_0 \epsilon_r = 10 - What is the speed of the EM wave in the material.

Homework Equations


v=(\sqrt{\mu_0 \mu_r \epsilon_0 \epsilon_r})^{-1}

The Attempt at a Solution



For part A I am really confused, well kind of, I am wondering whether in the text for part A they made a mistake and it should be just mu_r=1000 and just epsilon_r=10 , instead of the product of them and the constants sub0. Because if I do it as in the question I get a speed of 0.01m/s as shown below.

<br /> v=\frac{1}{\sqrt{10 \times 1000}} = 0.01 m/s<br />

But if I take it to be the relative values on their own I get a much higher value as shown below.

<br /> v=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8.85\times 10^{-12} \times 1000 \times 4 \times \pi \times 10^{-7} \times 10 }} = 2.99 \times 10^6 m/s<br />

So my question really, is it possible to have such slow propagating EM waves in materials like that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your intuition is good - ferrites typically have speeds of order 10^6m/s.
You can look up typical values or permitivity and permiability for various ferrites online and compare.

The trouble is, you cannot rule out that the material here is fiction for the purpose of teaching/testing you.
You should ask someone.

note: relative permiability is sometimes written as ##\mu/\mu_0## which could be a source of a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Simon Bridge said:
I think your intuition is good - ferrites typically have speeds of order 10^6m/s.
You can look up typical values or permitivity and permiability for various ferrites online and compare.

The trouble is, you cannot rule out that the material here is fiction for the purpose of teaching/testing you.
You should ask someone.

note: relative permiability is sometimes written as ##\mu/\mu_0## which could be a source of a typo.

Thanks. I emailed the lecturer on the basis of your reply and yeah, it was a mistake.

I get what you mean regarding it could have been a possible make believe scenario (thats why I wanted a second opinion) as they are prone to doing that. The other day on another modules homework we had to workout the de Broglie wavelength of an Ewok running on Endor where the 'h' has a value of 1000 Js! . (Sorry to detract from the OP) but knowing he would have a relatively large wavelength, what would the implications of that be, i.e. him running. Would he simply madly "interfere" with himself?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
993
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K