How Fast Must a Truck Travel to Knock a Motorcycle 3 Feet Away?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Benedict
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impact Speed
AI Thread Summary
Estimating the speed required for a truck to knock a motorcycle three feet away is complex and cannot be accurately determined without expert analysis. The discussion highlights that real-life impacts involve various factors, including the dynamics of the motorcycle's fall and the driver's reaction time. The scenario described suggests that if the truck was moving at 5 mph, it would have traveled a distance before stopping, potentially contradicting the claim of minimal impact. Additionally, the physics of the situation indicates that motorcycles do not simply fall straight down, complicating the assessment of the incident. Overall, a precise calculation is necessary to support the claim against the insurance company.
Bill Benedict
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I know an exact answer is impossible but an estimate will prove the following statement impossible. Allstates insured driver said he backed up hit my sons motorcycle, did not feel the impact, and stopped when he heard it hit the ground. He parked and got out and the motorcycle was 3' from the rear bumper of the truck.
What speed would the 6025lb truck have to be going to knock the 550lb motorcycle 3' beyond the bumper of the truck. I know he would have to be traveling at a rate of speed much higher than he was and I'm looking for numbers to prove it to the insurance company.
My belief on what happened. If he was backing up at 5mph then he is traveling 7.3" per second. It takes a 36" object .43 seconds to fall (without the impact). He didn't stop until he heard the impact which means he would have traveled 3.1' before he stopped. His rear tire is 30" from his bumper proving his rear tire would have ran onto the rear tire of the motorcycle. Does this make sense?
Sorry I'm not a physicist or mathematician just an elementary teacher trying to fight the insurance company to cover the damages to my sons motorcycle.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please don't post email addresses here.

That question is impossible to answer without a detailed analysis. There are experts for this, and the insurance won't take "someone on the internet said this!" seriously.

Some points to think about:
- real-life impacts are not collisions between point-like or spherical objects
- reaction times of drivers are variable
- motorcycles are not falling down vertically. If they start close to the balanced position, they can need a long time to hit the road with the side.
- after hitting the road, motorbikes can still move
 
  • Like
Likes Bill Benedict
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top