I How feasible is home radio astronomy?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vanadium 50
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Homemade radio astronomy is technically feasible but not practical for most individuals due to the complexity and resources required. Technologies like software-defined radio (SDR) and satellite dishes can aid in building a radio telescope, but significant expertise in electronics and data processing is necessary. Observing sources like the Sun, Venus, and pulsars is possible, but achieving the sensitivity needed to detect faint signals is challenging. The discussion highlights that successful amateur radio astronomy often requires collaboration and a well-planned approach to target selection and equipment design. Overall, while DIY radio astronomy projects can be educational, they may not yield significant scientific results without substantial investment and expertise.
  • #51
Vanadium 50 said:
will make my neighbors sad.
Or mad. Do they already have their own Tiki Torches...?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #52
Baluncore said:
Why collect and combine a year, when it can all be done in 12 hours?
Vanadium 50 said:
Because a 15m disk is awkward, expensive and will make my neighbors sad.
It will certainly be more interesting, Doppler adjusting the pulse rate, then accumulating the time shifted pulses through the different seasons.
 
  • #53
Vanadium 50 said:
TL;DR Summary: Is a homemade radio telescope realistic?

Is a homemade radio telescope realistic?

There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs.

Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is noticeably more snow and static than when pointing it away from the sun (i.e. lines up with it). But I am looking to see what else can be done.

I imagine getting a couple of DishTV dishes, and mounting them in the corners of my house or yard,. This gives the directionality of a house or yard sized dish, but of course not the sensitivity. Ballpark a few degree resolution for the array (more like 30 for one dish) It is likely easier to point with phase than with motors. Use SDR as receivers, record every night to disk and "stack" days or weeks of exposure together. Because its SDR you can look, e.g. on and off the 21 cm peak and map out hydrogen.
FWIW, the EDGES 21cm radio-telescope, which has gotten very serious academic and scientific attention, was very basic and could have been done as a home astronomy project. A picture of it is at their website:

Screenshot 2024-10-30 at 3.03.47 PM.png


Of course, part of this boils down to where your home is. A critical feature of this radio-telescope is that it is located in "a radio-quiet zone in western Australia". The EDGES group is building a sister radio-telescope in "radio-quiet—Devon Island in Nunavut, Canada".

So, if you live in the middle of nowhere, this can work. If you live in the East Village of Manhattan, on the other hand, don't bother. The local radio background noise will dwarf anything interesting you can pick up from space aside from the Sun.
 
Last edited:
  • #54
ohwilleke said:
So, if you live in the middle of nowhere, this can work. If you live in the East Village of Manhattan, on the other hand, don't bother. The local radio background noise will dwarf anything interesting you can pick up from space aside from the Sun.
That is one experimental antenna element being evaluated. I believe there will be two in the array, separated by 150 metres. That makes it an interferometer for low-band VHF. While the elements are low-profile, the array is ten times larger than a 15-metre dish.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top