How hard something hits the ground

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ground Hard
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of how hard an object hits the ground, specifically analyzing a one-kilogram object dropped from heights of 1 meter and 2 meters. It is established that while the mass and gravitational acceleration remain constant, the force of impact differs due to changes in momentum and kinetic energy. The force of impact is calculated using the formula F = -m * sqrt(2gh), yielding 4.42N for a 1-meter drop and 6.2N for a 2-meter drop. The conversation emphasizes that the impact force is a result of the ground's reaction to the object's momentum, not merely the gravitational force acting on the object.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion, particularly F = ma and F = dP/dt.
  • Knowledge of basic physics concepts such as momentum and kinetic energy.
  • Familiarity with the equations of motion, specifically v = sqrt(2gh).
  • Ability to perform calculations involving force, mass, and acceleration.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of impulse and its relation to momentum in physics.
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in free fall scenarios.
  • Explore the effects of different surfaces on impact force and energy dissipation.
  • Investigate advanced topics in dynamics, such as collision theory and force-time graphs.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of falling objects and impact forces. This discussion is particularly beneficial for those studying mechanics and applying Newtonian physics principles.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Let's say I have a one-kilogram object, and I drop it from heights of 1 meter and 2 meters, respectively, ignoring air resistance/friction and so forth. Are the following statements true?

The objects hit the ground with the same force since the mass and acceleration (due to gravity) do not change.

How "hard" it hits the ground is due to the differing momentum and slight increase in kinetic energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, the statement f=ma is not the most accurate (at least, your usage of it in this case). Yes, the mass and acceleration due to gravity are constant. On the other hand, F = ma depends on the resultant acceleration vector on the object, not gravity alone. Newton's original formulation was F = dP/dt, which means change in momentum over change in time. In this case, the change in momentum is ALL of the object's momentum (i.e. F = -mv). Now the impact velocity is given by v = sqrt(2gh) so F = -m * sqrt(2gh). So force of impact for 1m with 1kg is given by F = 1kg*sqrt (2*9.8*1m) = 4.42N. For 2 metres, it is 6.2N. This of course translates into common sense, you will hit the ground harder from a 100ft drop compared to a 10ft drop.
 
Last edited:
Shackleford said:
Let's say I have a one-kilogram object, and I drop it from heights of 1 meter and 2 meters, respectively, ignoring air resistance/friction and so forth. Are the following statements true?

The objects hit the ground with the same force since the mass and acceleration (due to gravity) do not change.

How "hard" it hits the ground is due to the differing momentum and slight increase in kinetic energy.

How hard the object hits the ground is dependent on the Power exerted by the ground to stop it, not on the force of gravity (not directly at least).

P=\frac{Fd}{t}=\frac{mad}{t}=\frac{md\sqrt{2gh}}{t^2}

Where P is the power (ie. How hard it hits), d is the distance to come to a complete stop, t is the time to come to a complete stop, m is the mass of the object, and a is the deceleration of the object. The last equivalence comes from the explanation given by dst above.
 
Last edited:
dst said:
OK, the statement f=ma is not the most accurate (at least, your usage of it in this case). Yes, the mass and acceleration due to gravity are constant. On the other hand, F = ma depends on the resultant acceleration vector on the object, not gravity alone. Newton's original formulation was F = dP/dt, which means change in momentum over change in time. In this case, the change in momentum is ALL of the object's momentum (i.e. F = -mv). Now the impact velocity is given by v = sqrt(2gh) so F = -m * sqrt(2gh). So force of impact for 1m with 1kg is given by F = 1kg*sqrt (2*9.8*1m) = 4.42N. For 2 metres, it is 6.2N. This of course translates into common sense, you will hit the ground harder from a 100ft drop compared to a 10ft drop.

Yes, I know it's the net force on the object. I was aiming for terseness here. I'm in Cal III, so I know all about derivation, blah blah, et cetera. I was hoping some of this was implied. Of course, I know the object dropped from a higher elevation would produce a greater "force." I was trying to figure out how you would express it correctly in physics.

So, the force is given by the product of mass and the instantaneous change in the objects momentum, which would thus translate into the instantaneous change in velocity of the object. At the instant it hits the ground it transfer all of its momentum to the ground and it goes from its calculated velocity to zero.
 
Shackleford said:
The objects hit the ground with the same force since the mass and acceleration (due to gravity) do not change.
Same force as what? Same force as dropped from 1m as from 2m? Definitely not.

When it hits the ground, the acceleration is not the acceleration due to gravity.
How "hard" it hits the ground is due to the differing momentum and slight increase in kinetic energy.
Yes.
 
russ_watters said:
Same force as what? Same force as dropped from 1m as from 2m? Definitely not.

When it hits the ground, the acceleration is not the acceleration due to gravity. Yes.

The same force is the applied gravitational force.

The negative acceleration/deceleration is from the ground.
 
Ok, that's what I thought you meant. The answer is no, since when an object hits the ground, it stops quickly. That requires a lot more force.
 
russ_watters said:
Ok, that's what I thought you meant. The answer is no, since when an object hits the ground, it stops quickly. That requires a lot more force.

Right. So, technically, it's incorrect to say how hard something hits the ground. Really, it's how hard the ground hits the object.
 
It's the accelaration ie. how quickly you stop - as they say 'it's not the fall that kills you it's the sudden stop at the bottom'
 
  • #10
mgb_phys said:
It's the accelaration ie. how quickly you stop - as they say 'it's not the fall that kills you it's the sudden stop at the bottom'

Yeah. Ok. Thanks for the clarification, guys.
 
  • #11
Shackleford said:
Right. So, technically, it's incorrect to say how hard something hits the ground. Really, it's how hard the ground hits the object.
It doesn't really matter how you say it. Each applies a force on the other.
 
  • #12
russ_watters said:
It doesn't really matter how you say it. Each applies a force on the other.

Yeah, I guess it doesn't matter now that I think about it. Thank you, Newton's Third Law. But the cause of the acceleration is because the object is hitting the ground.
 
  • #13
dst said:
OK, the statement f=ma is not the most accurate (at least, your usage of it in this case). Yes, the mass and acceleration due to gravity are constant. On the other hand, F = ma depends on the resultant acceleration vector on the object, not gravity alone. Newton's original formulation was F = dP/dt, which means change in momentum over change in time. In this case, the change in momentum is ALL of the object's momentum (i.e. F = -mv). Now the impact velocity is given by v = sqrt(2gh) so F = -m * sqrt(2gh). So force of impact for 1m with 1kg is given by F = 1kg*sqrt (2*9.8*1m) = 4.42N. For 2 metres, it is 6.2N. This of course translates into common sense, you will hit the ground harder from a 100ft drop compared to a 10ft drop.

You started out right but ended up wrong here. You have dp correct, but forgot the dt part, which isn't knowable, really, without experimentation. The forces above are wrong
 
  • #14
regor60 said:
You started out right but ended up wrong here. You have dp correct, but forgot the dt part, which isn't knowable, really, without experimentation. The forces above are wrong

You're correct. I realized that just after I posted, a brain fart I guess. The force comes from the ground acting on the object and then you'll have to take into account loads of things like the depth it penetrates, but I guess that doesn't help. I originally meant to write about impulse but somewhere I got muddled up and wrote force. :redface:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
9K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
781
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
631
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K