MHB How have I dropped a factor 2 on the square root of 19?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical problem involving the equation derived from a geometric context. The equation simplifies to \(30 = 3x^2 - 18x\), leading to the completion of the square method. The solution yields \(x = 3 \pm \sqrt{19}\). A participant expresses confusion about a supposed missing factor of two on the square root of 19, but another clarifies that no factor was actually dropped. The resolution emphasizes that the calculations are correct as presented.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
The main problem is http://mathhelpboards.com/pre-algebra-algebra-2/find-length-dc-19355.html#post88492

In this question

$15 = \dfrac{\left((x+3)+(2x-3)\right)h}{2}=\frac12 ((x+3)+(2x-3))\times((2x-3) -(x+3))=\frac12((2x-3)^2-(x+3)^2)=\frac12(3 x^2-18 x)$

So we get $30=3x^2-18x$

Now using the complete the square method

$x^2-6x=10$
$x^2-6x+9=19$
$x=3\pm\sqrt {19}$

This is what I get , I know that i Have missed a factor of two on the square root of 19, How and why was that dropped?

:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
I know that i Have missed a factor of two on the square root of 19
You have not.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top