MHB How have I dropped a factor 2 on the square root of 19?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a mathematical problem involving the equation derived from a geometric context. The equation simplifies to \(30 = 3x^2 - 18x\), leading to the completion of the square method. The solution yields \(x = 3 \pm \sqrt{19}\). A participant expresses confusion about a supposed missing factor of two on the square root of 19, but another clarifies that no factor was actually dropped. The resolution emphasizes that the calculations are correct as presented.
mathlearn
Messages
331
Reaction score
0
The main problem is http://mathhelpboards.com/pre-algebra-algebra-2/find-length-dc-19355.html#post88492

In this question

$15 = \dfrac{\left((x+3)+(2x-3)\right)h}{2}=\frac12 ((x+3)+(2x-3))\times((2x-3) -(x+3))=\frac12((2x-3)^2-(x+3)^2)=\frac12(3 x^2-18 x)$

So we get $30=3x^2-18x$

Now using the complete the square method

$x^2-6x=10$
$x^2-6x+9=19$
$x=3\pm\sqrt {19}$

This is what I get , I know that i Have missed a factor of two on the square root of 19, How and why was that dropped?

:)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mathlearn said:
I know that i Have missed a factor of two on the square root of 19
You have not.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top