How High Was the Balloon When the Stone Was Dropped?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the height of a balloon when a stone is dropped. Participants analyze the equations of motion, initial velocities, and the interpretation of the problem statement. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and conceptual clarification regarding projectile motion and free fall.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a calculation using the equation for vertical motion, assuming an initial velocity and a specific angle, leading to a height of -490m plus a term involving Sin0.
  • Another participant challenges the relevance of the equation used, arguing that it does not apply to the problem as stated, which lacks horizontal motion.
  • A third participant emphasizes the need for clarity in defining variables and suggests that a free body diagram might be more appropriate for understanding the problem.
  • Some participants agree that if Sin0 is taken as 1 (when theta is 90 degrees), the calculations could be correct, but they question the validity of assuming Sin0 equals 490/100.
  • One participant proposes a method to calculate the balloon's height based on the time of fall and initial ascent, arriving at an altitude of approximately 484.9m.
  • Another participant points out that the assumption of Sin0 being greater than 1 is problematic and should raise concerns about the calculations.
  • There is a reiteration of the calculation method, with a suggestion that the original problem may have been misinterpreted, leading to different conclusions about the balloon's height.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of equations and the interpretation of the problem statement. There is no consensus on the correct approach or final answer, with multiple competing interpretations remaining unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of defining variables clearly and the potential for misinterpretation of the problem statement. The discussion reflects uncertainty regarding the application of trigonometric functions and the assumptions made in calculations.

tremain74
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
I have a problem that says a stone is dropped from a balloon that is ascending at a uniform rate of 10 m/s. If it takes the stone 10 s to reach the ground, how high was the balloon at the instant the stone was dropped? The answer is 485m.
Relevant Equations
I am using the projectile motion. ay = -9.8m/s^2 for negative gravity. Vy = -9.8 + V0sin0. V0 is initial velocity. Sin0 is sin of theta. y = -4.9 t^2 + v0*t* Sin0.
ay = -9.8. Vy = -9.8 + v0*Sin0. y = -4.9*t^2 + v0*t*Sin0. By using formula of y, my solution was -4.9(10s)^2 + (10m/s)(10s)Sin0. I assumed that y was equal to 0. Since -4.9 is m/s^2 the answer would be -490m + 100m*Sin0. Therefore I assumeed Sin0 = 490/100.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your "relevant equation" does not match your problem description.
Your equation is used for a situation where there is a horizontal component to the velocity of the object in free flight.
But the problem you stated does not presume any horizontal motion - nor would it be affected by horizontal motion.
When I solve the problem as stated by you, I do not get 485 meters, nor do I get anything similar to your calculation, nor do I use trigonometry.
 
.Scott said:
Your "relevant equation" does not match your problem description.
At least not without specification. To use it, you must argue theta to be 90 deg., then it is correct. But it is a good idea to understand and define each element in the equation.....which you do not do. A free body diagram might be a better start .....
 
I agree (with @hutchphd) . When theta is taken as 90 degrees, then "Sin0" is 1 and the calculation in the second-to-last statement (of @tremain74 ) is correct.
But what is "Therefore I assumed Sin0 = 490/100." supposed to mean? Even if you are trying to force it to the answer provided (the apparently incorrect 485m), that statement would not be true.
 
Suppose an observer measured the time since the stone began to fall and it was 10 seconds.
The initial velocity of the stone in the opposite direction was 10 m/s and it stopped its ascent in 10/9.8 seconds.
That means the rock flies up 9.8*(10/9.8)^2/2=5.1m
From this point the stone falls in 10 seconds to the ground 9.8*10^2/2=490 m
That means the balloon was at 490-5.1=484.9 m altitude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pbuk
Sin0 being ##\frac{490}{100} >>1## , should itself be a warning.
 
Babadag said:
Suppose an observer measured the time since the stone began to fall and it was 10 seconds.
The initial velocity of the stone in the opposite direction was 10 m/s and it stopped its ascent in 10/9.8 seconds.
That means the rock flies up 9.8*(10/9.8)^2/2=5.1m
From this point the stone falls in 10 seconds to the ground 9.8*10^2/2=490 m
That means the balloon was at 490-5.1=484.9 m altitude.
Congratulations on reverse engineering the answer to work out what the question should have been!

The key lies in interpreting the phrase
tremain74 said:
If it takes the stone 10 s to reach the ground
In order to reach the answer of 485 m you need to interpret this phrase as "if the stone reaches the ground 10 s after it reaches its highest point" or "if the stone reaches the ground 10 s after its speed is zero".

As written by the OP, the answer is 390 m.

But whatever the original question that was set was, the answer clearly has nothing to do with trigonometry - all that is required is the right selection from the SUVAT equations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Babadag

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K