How important is the work done by people who work in finance?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the importance of finance professionals in society, exploring their roles and contributions. Participants seek to clarify what is meant by "importance" and how finance impacts daily life, commerce, and economic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants emphasize the practical benefits of finance, such as the ability to use credit cards and access cash through ATMs.
  • Others argue that finance professionals play a crucial role in the functioning of the global financial system, which supports commerce and daily transactions.
  • A participant questions the definition of finance and suggests that the term should refer specifically to those with degrees in finance.
  • There is a discussion about the role of banks and credit in the economy, with some noting that credit is foundational to modern economic systems.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for financial systems to lead to economic instability, referencing historical events like the .com bubble and housing crisis.
  • Some participants assert that finance professionals are essential for businesses to manage their finances and comply with legal requirements.
  • There is a debate about whether the economy operates on a zero-sum basis, with differing opinions on long-term wealth accumulation versus debt.
  • A participant suggests that the understanding of finance among some contributors may be lacking, prompting a recommendation for further reading in economics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the importance of finance, with no clear consensus on what constitutes that importance or how finance professionals contribute to society. Disagreements exist regarding the implications of financial systems and the understanding of economic principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants have varying levels of knowledge about finance, which affects the clarity and depth of the discussion. Some statements reflect assumptions about economic principles that may not be universally accepted.

  • #31
russ_watters said:
They have debt but not net debt.
It seems that a country more debt have, more rich is.

phinds said:
Really, you are getting nowhere with a small Q&A session on an internet forum. Read some economics.
Suggest me some title then.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Grands said:
It seems that a country more debt have, more rich is.
Yes, in general you would expect that to be true.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #34
  • #35
Grands said:
How is possible that a neurologist wrote a book about economics?

Rather that than an economist writing a book about neurology.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and BWV
  • #36
PeroK said:
Rather that than an economist writing a book about neurology.
I hope this is not a joke.
 
  • #37
Grands said:
Suggest me some title then.
I'm not an economist and don't have a good recommendation for a starting book. Hopefully others here will.

I certainly agree with bwv ... you do NOT want to start out with theoretical economics. That stuff will make your head hurt.
 
  • #38
russ_watters said:
Over the long term, almost everyone ends up with more money.

And we hope the ability to buy more stuff too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #39
I think I've said it before to OP, maybe not:

start reading The Economist on a weekly basis. If he reads the "Business" section and especially the "Finance and Economics" section he will gradually pickup an awful lot. They even pioneered light-hearted but smart things like "The Big-Mac Index" to look at relative currency costs. It's not as dry or as technical as a textbook, though will walk-through textbook concepts. There are some other pretty good sections too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
  • #40
StoneTemplePython said:
I think I've said it before to OP, maybe not:

start reading The Economist on a weekly basis. If he reads the "Business" section and especially the "Finance and Economics" section he will gradually pickup an awful lot. They even pioneered light-hearted but smart things like "The Big-Mac Index" to look at relative currency costs. It's not as dry or as technical as a textbook, though will walk-through textbook concepts. There are some other pretty good sections too.
I agree. I read The Economist regularly.
 
  • #41
StoneTemplePython said:
The Big-Mac Index"
I heard about it and I heard what it is.
Anyway, my intent was just to understand what a person that work in Finance do.

I know that who study economist care about management of a company, who study business try to organize how that company should sell a products, who work in a bank have to be careful to approve loan to the "right" people, but I have no idea about Finance.
 
  • #42
Grands said:
So how is possible that every nation have a public debt and no nation have a public credit?

It's not. It's also a very ill-posed question - it asks us to explain why something is true, when it is not.

If you mean "any debt at all", pretty much all organizations have some debt. If you order something on a Tuesday and pay the invoice on Friday, that's debt. But if that's what you mean, pretty much all organizations also have some credit. If you pay for something on Tuesday and they don't ship it to Friday, you have a credit. So the premise of your question is untrue.

If you mean "net debt", it's also untrue. Denmark, Germany, Japan. All have a net credit. So again the premise of your question is untrue.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #43
Japan has the largest debt level (relative to its GDP) of any developed country, think what you are referring to is its positive trade balance
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #44
Vanadium 50 said:
It's not. It's also a very ill-posed question - it asks us to explain why something is true, when it is not.

If you mean "any debt at all", pretty much all organizations have some debt. If you order something on a Tuesday and pay the invoice on Friday, that's debt. But if that's what you mean, pretty much all organizations also have some credit. If you pay for something on Tuesday and they don't ship it to Friday, you have a credit. So the premise of your question is untrue.

If you mean "net debt", it's also untrue. Denmark, Germany, Japan. All have a net credit. So again the premise of your question is untrue.
Thanks for your answers.
So basically the public debt is just something that State try to pay everyday and can't pay the entirely sum in one day?
 
  • #45
BWV said:
Japan has the largest debt level (relative to its GDP)

But that debt is largely held domestically. Which exposes yet a third way of looking at Grands' ill-posed question: "why do governments borrow from their citizens instead of lend to them?" The answer is that while they do both to some degree, they're really not banks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #46
Vanadium 50 said:
But that debt is largely held domestically. Which exposes yet a third way of looking at Grands' ill-posed question: "why do governments borrow from their citizens instead of lend to them?" The answer is that while they do both to some degree, they're really not banks.
My question was about what people that study finance is doing, which service they provide for people.
Then russ started to speak about public debt, and that the sum of all debts and credits is 0, and I asked how this is possible considering that all the countries have a debt.
 
  • #47
Every debt is someone else’s asset - for every borrower there must be a lender. It is just an accounting identity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #48
Grands said:
Thanks for your answers.
So basically the public debt is just something that State try to pay everyday and can't pay the entirely sum in one day?

States generally never pay off their debt, they keep rolling it over and rely on a combination of economic growth and inflation to reduce its value relative to the economy.
 
  • #49
BWV said:
States generally never pay off their debt, they keep rolling it over and rely on a combination of economic growth and inflation to reduce its value relative to the economy.
Ok, and who give the money to the countries ?
 
  • #50
States borrow issuing bonds which are purchased by savers
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #51
BWV said:
States borrow issuing bonds which are purchased by savers
Yes and savers are common people?
I can buy by myself a bond from the State?
 
  • #52
Yes, or one from another country
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #53
BWV said:
Yes, or one from another country
So basically the State create the money and they it have problem with taking it back?
 
  • #54
No, just think of that as two separate issues. Back when money was gold and silver, uncreated by the state, states still borrowed and went into debt.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grands
  • #55
BWV said:
No, just think of that as two separate issues. Back when money was gold and silver, uncreated by the state, states still borrowed and went into debt.
Yes, I read about this, and about the fact that gold and silver became banknotes little by little, thanks to the bank, but is not clear how the State decide how much money to put into circulation, if was the banks that had the money in the past.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K