How Is Ampere's Law Applied to Calculate Magnetic Fields?

AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law is not applicable for calculating the magnetic field of a short conductor, such as a 3.5 cm wire carrying 1.8 A of current. Instead, the Biot-Savart Law should be used to determine the magnetic field's magnitude, depending on the specific location where it is evaluated. The problem's wording could imply that the wire is long, with the distance of 3.5 cm referring to a point of interest from the wire. Clarification on the context and parameters is essential for accurate application of the relevant laws. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for solving magnetic field problems effectively.
This Is Me
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
What is the magnitude of a magnetic field from a 3.5 cm straight conductor with a current of 1.8 A?
Relevant Equations
∫B.dl = μ0I
(I accidentally missed my lesson and I don't know how to apply this question to the formula)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Even if you missed the lesson, you need to show some effort before we can offer tutorial help. What have you found in your searching so far? Have you looked this up on Hyperphysics? Have you read over the lesson notes? Which textbook are you using?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Even if you missed the lesson, you need to show some effort before we can offer tutorial help. What have you found in your searching so far? Have you looked this up on Hyperphysics? Have you read over the lesson notes? Which textbook are you using?
I got some help, thanks though.
 
This Is Me said:
I got some help, thanks though.
I cannot imagine what kind of help you got. The statement of the problem is
This Is Me said:
Homework Statement:: What is the magnitude of a magnetic field from a 3.5 cm straight conductor with a current of 1.8 A?
To me, it says that you have a conductor, most likely a wire, that is 3.5 cm long which carries a current of 1.8 A. In that case, Ampere's law is not applicable and you have to (a) use the law of Biot-Savart and (b) know where in space the magnitude of the field is to be calculated. Another interpretation could be that the conductor is a very long wire (not explicitly mentioned in the statement) and the point of interest is at a distance of 3.5 cm from it (also not explicitly stated).
 
  • Like
Likes Keith_McClary
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top