How Is Impulse Calculated in Volleyball Spiking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sheepcountme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Volleyball
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The impulse generated during a volleyball spike can be calculated using the formula J = mv(final) - mv(initial). In this scenario, the ball has a mass of 0.20 kg, an initial speed of 6.4 m/s, and a final speed of 21 m/s. The correct calculation for the impulse vector is J = (1.28, -4.2), where the x-component is negative due to the change in direction. To find the magnitude of the impulse, one must compute the hypotenuse of the resultant vector formed by the x and y components.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of impulse and momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with vector addition and components
  • Knowledge of basic algebra for calculations
  • Ability to compute the magnitude of a vector
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to calculate the magnitude of a vector using the Pythagorean theorem
  • Study the principles of momentum conservation in physics
  • Explore vector representation and operations in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of impulse in sports dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as coaches and athletes interested in understanding the physics behind volleyball spikes.

sheepcountme
Messages
80
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A ball is traveling horizontally over a volleyball net when a player "spikes" it, driving it straight down to the ground. The ball's mass is 0.20 kg, its speed before being hit is 6.4 m/s and its speed immediately after the spike is 21 m/s. What is the magnitude of the impulse from the spike?


Homework Equations



J=mv(final)-mv(initial)

The Attempt at a Solution


J=.20(0,-21)-.20(6.4,0)
J=(0,-4.2)-(1.28,0)
J=(1.28,-4.2)

I don't understand where I went wrong, but the book tells me that this is incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, assuming your calculations are correct, that's the impulse in vector form. The book wants the magnitude of the impulse.
 
Ah, perhaps you can tell me where I went wrong initially...

My first attempt to solve the problem was:
.20(21)-.20(6.4)=4.2-1.28=2.92
2.92 was incorrect, and then I thought perhaps it should be negative since the direction is down, but -2.92 was incorrect as well, so that is when I tried the vector form..which, to my dismay, was also incorrect.
 
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier.

sheepcountme said:
Ah, perhaps you can tell me where I went wrong initially...

My first attempt to solve the problem was:
.20(21)-.20(6.4)=4.2-1.28=2.92

Well, just algebraically adding together the x and y components of a vector doesn't make much sense, does it?

sheepcountme said:
2.92 was incorrect, and then I thought perhaps it should be negative since the direction is down, but -2.92 was incorrect as well, so that is when I tried the vector form..which, to my dismay, was also incorrect.

It's not that your answer for the impulse vector was necessarily wrong. It's just that the question wasn't asking for the vector. It was asking for the magnitude of that vector. How do you compute the magnitude of a vector? Hint: If you draw a picture of the x-component and y-component of a vector adding up "tip to tail" to form the resultant vector, what you have drawn is a right-angled triangle. The magnitude of the vector is its length, which is the length of the hypotenuse of the triangle in your picture. I think the calculation in your original post is mostly right, except...
sheepcountme said:

The Attempt at a Solution


J=.20(0,-21)-.20(6.4,0)
J=(0,-4.2)-(1.28,0)
J=(1.28,-4.2)

How do you get to this last line? For the x-component, 0 - 1.28 is not equal to 1.28. Also, you know that the x-component of the impulse should be negative, since the x-component of the momentum is initially positive, and ends up being zero.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
14K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K