Undergrad How is Lorenz-Lorentz relationship possible?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Lorenz-Lorentz relationship, expressed as (n²-1)/(n²+2)=(4π/3)Nam, reveals a theoretical limit on electric polarizability (α) rather than on the refractive index (n). As density (N) increases, the left side of the equation cannot reach unity, indicating that α approaches a maximum value of approximately 0.24/N. For an ideal gas at 20°C and 1 atm, this leads to α being less than 10⁻²⁰ cm³, consistent with empirical data. In ultra-dense conditions, the refractive index becomes imaginary, indicating that electromagnetic waves cannot propagate through such media.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Lorentz-Lorentz equation
  • Familiarity with concepts of electric polarizability (α)
  • Knowledge of refractive index (n) and relative permittivity (ε)
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic wave propagation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Lorentz-Lorentz equation
  • Research the relationship between electric polarizability and molecular structure
  • Explore the Clausius-Mossotti relation and its applications in dielectric materials
  • Investigate the behavior of electromagnetic waves in ultra-dense media
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and electrical engineers interested in the behavior of dielectrics and electromagnetic wave interactions in varying density conditions.

snorkack
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
536
Its form is:
(n2-1)/(n2+2)=(4π/3)Nam
There is one simple problem with it. Rearrange the left side and you get:
(n2+2-3)/(n2+2)=(4π/3)Nam
1-(3/(n2+2))=(4π/3)Nam
As you see, the left side cannot reach unity for arbitrarily large n2.
But there is no reason why N cannot be arbitrarily large!
How does n behave at high densities of dielectrics, where (4π/3)Nam approaches and exceeds unity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snorkack said:
As you see, the left side cannot reach unity for arbitrarily large n2.
But there is no reason why N cannot be arbitrarily large!
How does n behave at high densities of dielectrics, where (4π/3)Nam approaches and exceeds unity?
This is not a limitation on the refractive index ##n## but rather a theoretical limit on the maximum value of the electric polarizability ##\alpha##. If you solve the Lorentz-Lorenz (LL) equation for ##\alpha## and take the limit ##n\rightarrow\infty## you get:$$\alpha=\frac{3}{4\pi N}\left(\frac{n^{2}-1}{n^{2}+2}\right)\lt\frac{3}{4\pi N}\thickapprox\frac{0.24}{N}$$Now let's put in some numbers: for an ideal gas at ##20^{\circ}\text{C},1\text{ atm}## we have ##N^{-1}\simeq4\times10^{-20}\text{cm}^{3}##, so LL predicts that ##\alpha\lesssim10^{-20}\text{cm}^{3}##. And indeed, if you check tables of atomic and molecular polarizabilities, you discover that they all fall in the range ##10^{-25}-10^{-21}\text{cm}^3##. Another successful prediction of Lorentz-Lorenz theory!
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and Charles Link
But the problem is, since all substances are compressible, N has no upper bound and cannot have. So what does n do as N increases?
 
snorkack said:
So what does n do as N increases?
Well, the Lorentz-Lorenz relation is empirically most accurate for dilute gases, and reasonably good for dense gases and some liquids. But that said, we can just plow ahead and see what LL predicts for arbitrarily high concentrations. Let's start by substituting ##n^{2}=\varepsilon##, where ##\varepsilon## is the relative permittivity (dielectric constant), into the LL relation to get the Clausius-Mossotti form ##\alpha=\frac{3}{4\pi N}\left(\frac{\varepsilon-1}{\varepsilon+2}\right)##. Solving for the permittivity gives ##\varepsilon=n^{2}=\frac{9}{3-4\pi N\alpha}-2##. In the ultra-dense limit ##N\rightarrow\infty##, we see that the permittivity ##\varepsilon=-2## is negative, and that the refractive-index becomes purely imaginary, ##n=\sqrt{2}i##. An electromagnetic plane-wave normally-incident from vacuum onto the surface of such an ultra-dense dielectric medium cannot propagate inside. Instead, the wave is perfectly reflected since the reflection coefficient ##\frac{\sqrt{2}i-1}{\sqrt{2}i+1}## has magnitude ##1##. This LL prediction for an infinitely-dense medium seems physically reasonable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and Charles Link
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
880
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K