How Is Overlap Length x Determined for No Rotational Motion After Collision?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The problem involves determining the overlap length x for two identical sticks, each of mass m and length l, to achieve translational motion without rotation after an inelastic collision. The initial stick spins with angular frequency ω and collides with a stationary stick. By applying the conservation of linear momentum and angular momentum, it is established that the overlap length x must equal 2/3 of the stick's length (x = 2/3 l) to ensure the double-stick system moves translationally without rotation post-collision.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of linear momentum conservation
  • Familiarity with inelastic collisions
  • Basic mechanics of rigid body motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in inelastic collisions
  • Learn about the moment of inertia for various shapes, particularly rods
  • Explore the concept of center of mass in composite systems
  • Investigate the effects of rotational motion on linear motion in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone studying mechanics, particularly those focusing on collisions and rotational dynamics.

conana
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



On a frictionless horizontal table, a stick of mass m and length l spins around a pivot at one of its ends with angular frequency [tex]\omega[/tex]. It collides and sticks to an identical stick (which is presumably stationary), with an overlap length equal to x. Immediately before the collision, the pivot is removed. What should x be so that after the collision the double-stick system has translational but no rotational motion?

The Attempt at a Solution



From the diagram provided, it appears that the collision is inelastic so I am pretty sure I can not use conservation of energy. I guess my approach would be to use conservation of angular momentum and possibly linear momentum as well. I am pretty lost as to how to get started. I tried writing out an expression for my angular momentum but I am not sure what to use as my origin and how to find the angular momentum after the collision.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do the sticks stick together? (All puns intended.) I'll assume they do, because I don't think the problem is solvable otherwise.

You're right that you need both the conservation of linear momentum and the conservation of angular momentum. Since the sticks must move in the same direction, you know that their final momentum, 2mv, must be equal to the initial momentum of the moving stick.

For angular momentum, you can use any origin you want. I'd pick the middle of the overlap of the 2 sticks because that simplifies calculations quite a bit--final angular momentum ends up being 0 being the two-rod combination's center of mass moves directly away from the origin. Initial angular momentum is pretty easy to calculate.
 
For linear momentum I get

[tex]p_i=p_f[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow mv_i=2mv_f[/tex].

[tex]\Rightarrow \dfrac{1}{2}ml\omega=2mv_f[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow v_f=\dfrac{1}{4}l\omega[/tex].

Then for the angular momentum, using the middle of the overlap of the two sticks as my origin, I get

[tex]L_i=L_f[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow mv_ir-I\omega=0[/tex]

(Initially I typed this out as a sum of two Ls instead of a difference which gave me a nonsensical answer x>l. I now believe it to be a difference because the CM of the stick is rotating in one direction about the origin while the stick is rotating in the opposite direction about its center of mass. Is this logic correct?)

where the distance from the origin to the CM of the rotating stick [tex]r=\dfrac{l-x}{2}[/tex] and the moment of inertia of the stick about its CM [tex]I=\dfrac{1}{12}ml^2[/tex]. Then

[tex]ml\omega\dfrac{l-x}{4}-\dfrac{1}{12}ml^2\omega=0[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow x=\dfrac{2}{3}l[/tex].

Is this looking to be on the right track? Also, (assuming this is correct) it appears as though I didn't end up needing to use conservation of linear momentum, just my initial linear momentum. Thank you so much for your help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
67
Views
5K