How is Stoke's theorem applied in this situation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pythagorean
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Stoke's theorem to prove that the integral of the unit tangent vector \( \hat{t} \) over a closed curve \( C \) equals zero. The key insight is that when applying Stoke's theorem, one typically uses a vector function to compute the curl and dot it with the surface normal vector \( n \). However, in this case, the integral involves a vector without a dot product, prompting the suggestion to consider a constant vector \( \vec{c} \) with zero curl to derive a useful corollary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Stoke's theorem and its applications
  • Familiarity with vector calculus concepts, including curl and dot products
  • Knowledge of unit vectors and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in handling integrals over curves and surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Stoke's theorem in vector fields
  • Learn about the diad product and its applications in vector calculus
  • Explore examples of integrating vector functions over closed curves
  • Investigate the relationship between curl and line integrals in vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus, as well as anyone looking to deepen their understanding of Stoke's theorem and its applications in physics and engineering.

Pythagorean
Science Advisor
Messages
4,430
Reaction score
327

Homework Statement



Prove:

[tex]\int \hat{t} ds = 0[/tex]

over C, a closed curve; t is the unit vector tangent to C.


Homework Equations



stoke's theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



My issue is that normally, stoke's theorem involves a vector function that we dot into the unit vector (t) (resulting in a scalar) and when we use stoke's theorem, we instead curl that vector function, then dot it into n, the surface normal vector.

However, in this situation, there's no dot product, so we're integrating a vector.

My first attempt was to use the diad product, but I feel like I'm being a bit cavalier with it. I'd just like a hint, but not a full solution so that I can think about it more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using an intermediate step: If you use Stoke's theorem directly for a vector [tex]\vec{c}[/tex] that's constant over space (and hence has zero curl ), you should be able to easily derive a useful corollary here.
 
gabbagabbahey is quite correct. If you want to see a dot product in there, the ith component of the integral around the curve of the tangent vector is the integral of the dot product of the tangent vector t with the ith basis vector.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K