How Is Temperature Defined in Kelvin Using Fundamental Units?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
"pi"mp
Messages
129
Reaction score
1
Hi all,
I'm reading through Zwiebach's String Theory text on my own and am thinking about one of his very elementary exercises on "units." We are asked to define temperature in Kelvin with reference to the fundamental units of mass, length, and time. My thought is the following:

We take kT=hf where here f is the frequency of oscillation of Cs-133 radiation at that temperature since that is how the "second" is defined. Then we will have defined the temperature T (in Kelvin) in terms of only numerical quantities whose value we know (k and h) and f.

I'm not very confident about this at all but I'm not sure how else to do it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is the usual way to make units less dependent on specific setups, indeed. I think "fundamental units of mass, length and time" are the Planck units here, not specific transition in some specific isotope.
 
Ah okay, so how would I go about constructing the Kelvin that way?
 
You can just use kT=hf as definition, with fixed values for k and h (in Planck units, h has a known value anyway). The value of k is arbitrary.
 
hmm okay. But then what would "f" be? I thought you said we ought not refer to a specific isotope or anything like that.