How Is Tension Calculated in an Atwood's Machine?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The tension in the cord of an Atwood's machine can be calculated using the masses of the blocks and Newton's second law, F = ma. In this scenario, Block 1 has a mass of 0.900 kg and Block 2 has a mass of 2.70 kg. The correct approach involves drawing free-body diagrams for both blocks, identifying the forces acting on them, and applying the equations T1 - W1 = ma1 and T2 - W2 = ma2. The key error identified in the discussion is the incorrect handling of the signs in the equations, which affects the calculation of tension.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F = ma)
  • Ability to draw and interpret free-body diagrams
  • Knowledge of gravitational force calculations (weight = mass × gravity)
  • Familiarity with the concept of tension in a cord system
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of tension in Atwood's machine scenarios
  • Practice solving problems involving multiple masses and pulleys
  • Learn about the effects of friction and pulley mass on tension calculations
  • Explore advanced dynamics concepts such as systems of equations in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and dynamics, as well as educators looking for clear examples of tension calculations in pulley systems.

martyk
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The figure shows two blocks connected by a cord (of negligible mass) that passes over a frictionless pulley (also of negligible mass). The arrangement is known as Atwood's machine. Block 1 has mass m1 = 0.900 kg; block 2 has mass m2 = 2.70 kg. What is the tension in the cord? Assume a y-axis has its positive direction upward.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/50/q55u.jpg


Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok can someone tell me what is wrong with my approach here. I drew two free-body diagrams, and both basically the same. My free body diagrams have only 2 forces acting on the boxes. Upwards is the tension, and downwards is the weight of the boxes. So let T1 and W1 be the forces on the first box, and T2 and W2 be the forces on the second box. And based on this scenario, I know that T1 and T2 are equal, so is acceleration

I summed up the forces acting on the first box, which leaves T1 - W1 = ma1, since the problem is asking for tension of the cord, I rearranged the equation to this T1 = ma1 + W1. I did the exact same with the second box. T2 - W2 = ma2, hence T2 = ma2 + W2. Since T1 = T2, I set these two equations equal to find A (note that a1 and a2 should be equal also). After plugging in the numbers in the parameters I got acceleration as -9.8m/s. Plugged it back to the tension equation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
martyk said:

Homework Statement


The figure shows two blocks connected by a cord (of negligible mass) that passes over a frictionless pulley (also of negligible mass). The arrangement is known as Atwood's machine. Block 1 has mass m1 = 0.900 kg; block 2 has mass m2 = 2.70 kg. What is the tension in the cord? Assume a y-axis has its positive direction upward.

http://img5.imageshack.us/img5/50/q55u.jpg


Homework Equations


F = ma


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok can someone tell me what is wrong with my approach here. I drew two free-body diagrams, and both basically the same. My free body diagrams have only 2 forces acting on the boxes. Upwards is the tension, and downwards is the weight of the boxes. So let T1 and W1 be the forces on the first box, and T2 and W2 be the forces on the second box. And based on this scenario, I know that T1 and T2 are equal
very good so far
, so is acceleration
their magnitudes are equal, but what about their directions?
I summed up the forces acting on the first box, which leaves T1 - W1 = ma1, since the problem is asking for tension of the cord, I rearranged the equation to this T1 = ma1 + W1.
good
I did the exact same with the second box. T2 - W2 = ma2, hence T2 = ma2 + W2.
Here's your error. It's all in the plus or minus sign.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K