How is the following operator linear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tamtam402
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Operator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the linearity of the operator F(r) = r - ix, where participants are examining whether this function meets the criteria for linearity in the context of vector functions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing the definition of linearity and comparing the operator to known linear functions. There is a focus on the implications of the components of the vector and the role of the variable x.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of linearity. Some have provided alternative formulations of the operator and questioned the assumptions about the variables involved. There is no explicit consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the definitions of linear functions in different contexts, particularly distinguishing between algebraic and linear algebra definitions. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the variables and their definitions.

tamtam402
Messages
199
Reaction score
0
How is the following operator linear??!

Homework Statement



Is the following a linear vector function?

F(r) = r - ix


Homework Equations



A function is linear if:

F(r1 + r2) = F(r1) + F(r2) AND F(ar) = aF(r)

The Attempt at a Solution



F(r1 + r2) = (r1 + r2) - ix

F(r1) + F(r2) = (r1 - ix) + (r2 - ix) = (r1 + r2) - 2ix


According to me, F(r1 + r2) ≠ F(r1) + F(r2), but Mary L Boas says otherwise. What gives?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Well you would agree that f(x) = mx + b is linear, right?
But f(x1 + x2) != f(x1) + f(x2)
 


Villyer said:
Well you would agree that f(x) = mx + b is linear, right?
But f(x1 + x2) != f(x1) + f(x2)

I'm not sure I understand your point? Yes, f(x) = mx + b is the function of a line, but it is NOT a linear function, since f(x1 + x2) ≠ f(x1) + f(x2). I'm not sure where you're getting at.

According to the Mary L Boas book, the operator I posted is supposed to be a linear operator, which means f(r1 + r2) = f(r1) + f(r2) and f(kr) = kf(r). My results show otherwise, since I find f(r1 + r2) != f(r1) + f(r2).
 


Villyer said:
Well you would agree that f(x) = mx + b is linear, right?
But f(x1 + x2) != f(x1) + f(x2)

f(x)=mx+b is not linear.

OP: could you quote the entire problem. What is \mathbf{r}? What is x?? What is \mathbf{i} (I suspect it is just the first basis vector)?

Could it be that \mathbf{r}=(x,y,z)??
 


micromass said:
f(x)=mx+b is not linear.

OP: could you quote the entire problem. What is \mathbf{r}? What is x?? What is \mathbf{i} (I suspect it is just the first basis vector)?

Could it be that \mathbf{r}=(x,y,z)??

i is the first basis vector, and r has been defined earlier in the book as (x,y,z), or ix + jy + kz.

I must be missing something, because it seems (according to your post) that r being (x,y,z) would change my solution, but I don't see how.
 


I still find f(r1+r2) = ix + 2jy + 2kz

f(r1) +f(r2) = 2jy + 2kz
 


tamtam402 said:
I still find f(r1+r2) = ix + 2jy + 2kz

f(r1) +f(r2) = 2jy + 2kz

You aren't distinguishing between the components of r1 and r2.

Let r1 = (x1, y1, z1), and r2 = (x2, y2, z2).

Now calculate f(r1 + r2) and compare that to f(r1) + f(r2).
 


Is this just a question about the multiple definitions of linear?

y=Ax+b is linear in one sense, and not linear in another sense, right?
 


Right. y=mx+b is the equation of a line in the xy-plane, so it's often called linear in that sense. It is not, however, linear in the linear algebra sense, which is what the OP's question is about.
 
  • #10


tamtam402 said:

Homework Statement



Is the following a linear vector function?

F(r) = r - ix


Homework Equations



A function is linear if:

F(r1 + r2) = F(r1) + F(r2) AND F(ar) = aF(r)

The Attempt at a Solution



F(r1 + r2) = (r1 + r2) - ix

F(r1) + F(r2) = (r1 - ix) + (r2 - ix) = (r1 + r2) - 2ix


According to me, F(r1 + r2) ≠ F(r1) + F(r2), but Mary L Boas says otherwise. What gives?

What gives is that your x needs to be tied to your r, so if you have r1 and r2 you need x1 and x2.

RGV
 
  • #11


You may want to write your F as

F(x,y,z)=(0,y,z)

Do you agree that this is your F?? Do you see that this is linear??
 
  • #12


To make it clear, I think the proper expression of your linear operator is this:

\underline F(a) = a - (a \cdot i) i

which clearly is linear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K