How is the Inverse Phasor Transform of Sum of Individual Phasors Proven?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter seminum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Phasor Proof
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
8 replies · 5K views
seminum
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Can someone show me how the inverse Phasor transform of the sum of individual Phasors of sinusoidal functions of the same frequency is the sum of the sinusoids? I could not find any rigorous proof and help appreciated.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Somehow I have a feeling the proof is in the Laplace transform...I will keep looking
 
Can you start by writing out an equation for what you say in words in Post #1?
 
Here are the equations:

[tex] \sigma = A_{0}\cos(wt + \phi_{0}) + A_{1}\cos(wt + \phi_{1}) + ... + A_{n}\cos(wt + \phi_{n}) = \mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi_{0})[/tex]
[tex] \sigma = \mathbf{Re}\{A_{0}e^{\phi_{0}i}e^{wti}\} + \mathbf{Re}\{A_{1}e^{\phi_{1}i}e^{wti}\} + ... + \mathbf{Re}\{A_{n}e^{\phi_{n}i}e^{wti}\}[/tex]
[tex] \sigma = \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{0}e^{wti}\} + \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{1}e^{wti}\} + ... + \mathbf{Re}\{\mathbf{P}_{n}e^{wti}\}[/tex]

My question why...?

[tex] \sum\limits_{i = 0}^{n} \mathbf{P}_{i} = \mathbf{P}\{\mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi)\}[/tex]

Thanks.
 
What do you mean by ##\mathbf{P}\{\mathbf{B}\cos(wt + \Phi)\}##? Does this equal ##\mathbf{B}\exp(i\Phi)##?

Also, is it significant that you used boldface for ##\mathbf{B}##? Isn't it just some real number? I want to make sure I understand what you are asking.
 
Yes. It's just the Phasor transform.

Yes, B is a real number.
 
OK,
$$\begin{align}
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\cos(\omega t + \phi_k) &= \sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k[\cos(\omega t)\cos(\phi_k) - \sin(\omega t)\sin(\phi_k)] \\
&= \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \cos(\phi_k)\right) \cos(\omega t) - \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)\right)\sin(\omega t) \\
&= A\cos(\omega t + \Phi) \\
\end{align}$$
To compute ##A## and ##\Phi##, we again use the trig identity
$$A\cos(\omega t + \Phi) = A\cos(\Phi)\cos(\omega t) - A\sin(\Phi)\sin(\omega t)$$
and compare with what we have above to conclude that
$$A \cos(\Phi) = \sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \cos(\phi_k)$$
and
$$A\sin(\Phi) = \sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)$$
Therefore,
$$\begin{align}
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \exp(i\phi_k) &=
\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k) + i\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k\sin(\phi_k)\\
&= A[\cos(\Phi) + i\sin(\Phi)] = A\exp(i \Phi)
\end{align}$$
which gives us what we want.

If desired, we can calculate ##A## and ##\Phi## explicitly as follows:
$$A = \sqrt{\left(\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k)\right)^2 + \left(\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \sin(\phi_k)\right)^2}$$
and
$$\Phi = \arctan\left(\frac{\sum_{k=0}^{n} A_k \sin(\phi_k)}{\sum_{k=0}^{n}A_k \cos(\phi_k)}\right)$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
seminum said:
Can someone show me how the inverse Phasor transform of the sum of individual Phasors of sinusoidal functions of the same frequency is the sum of the sinusoids?

jbunniii has a nice and very thorough demonstration above.

One of the interesting things you notice is the close relationship between addition of complex exponentials and angle addition in the trig identities. If you keep it in complex exponential form, then you can also show what you say (in words) above by:
$$
\begin{align}
\mathcal{P}^{-1} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} \mathbf{P}_j \Biggr\}
&= \mathcal{P}^{-1} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{\phi_{j}i} \Biggr\} \\
&= \mathbf{Re} \Biggl\{ \Biggl[ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{\phi_{j}i} \Biggr] e^{wti} \Biggr\} \\
&= \mathbf{Re} \Biggl\{ \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}e^{(wt+\phi_{j})i} \Biggr\} \\
&= \sum\limits_{j = 0}^{n} A_{j}\cos(wt+\phi_{j}) .
\end{align}
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person