How Is the Position Function H(t) for a Yo-Yo Derived in Calculus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter farnworth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Position
AI Thread Summary
The position function H(t) = t^3 - 6t^2 + 5t + 30 describes the height of a yo-yo over time, starting at 30 inches above ground. The terms in the equation relate to initial height and velocity, with the -6t^2 and 5t terms derived from standard motion equations, while the t^3 term likely accounts for the rotational dynamics of the yo-yo. The equation was found in "Calculus for Dummies," indicating it may serve primarily as a calculus practice problem rather than a representation of a real physical system. Understanding the derivation requires knowledge of both kinematics and rotational motion. This discussion highlights the intersection of calculus and physics in modeling motion.
farnworth
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
H(t) = t^3-6t^2+5t+30 this is a yo yo 30 inches above ground at t =0, at 4 secs it is 18 inches above ground. Please tell me how these figures are derived; t^3,6t^2, 5t; I realize the 30 is initial position. I am 81 but very curious. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did you get this equation? We can't tell you where it comes from until you tell us where you found it.
 
Hard to answer this without knowing any context of where did you find this equation. But I can try
It is well known fact that a body that is thrown with initial velocity ##v_0## upwards and from initial height ##y_0## will have an equation of motion, where y is the height from the ground at time t as follows:
$$y=y_0+v_0t-\frac{1}{2}gt^2$$
where g is the gravitational acceleration ##g=10m/s^2##
So I believe this explains (almost) the ##-6t^2## and ##5t## terms (for ##v_0=5## and ##-\frac{1}{2}g=-5## and ##y_0=30##). For the ##t^3 ## term I believe the explanation lies within the rotational dynamics of a yo-yo. As the yo-yo goes upward, some of its rotational kinetic energy is converted to gravitational potential energy and this might explain the presence of the ##t^3## term. But I haven't studied myself a lot the rotational dynamics of the yoyo so I can't tell you exactly how we get this term.
 
Thank you Delta2 I think I am almost there, I found this problem in 'Calculus for Dummies' page181. I really should have used a metric based problem. I really appreciate your kind reply. Regards.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
farnworth said:
I found this problem in 'Calculus for Dummies' page181.

Then it doesn't necessarily represent an actual physical system. It's just there to practice the mechanics of calculus.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top