How is the scale factor related to redshift in the FRW model?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The scale factor in the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) model is directly related to redshift through the equation 1+z(t) = a(t0)/a(t). This relationship indicates that as the universe expands, the wavelengths of light stretch, leading to an increase in redshift. The derivation of this equation is detailed in the Wikipedia entry under section 3.2.1. Redshift is calculated by comparing the scale factor at the present time to that in the past, as light received today reflects the universe's expansion. Understanding this connection helps clarify the dynamics of cosmic expansion and the behavior of light over time.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
I checked on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
and I found that the scale factor is related to the red shift, in FRW model, by:
1+z(t) = \frac{a(t_{0})}{a(t)}
How is that derived?

Also intuitively could you check this reasoning of mine?
Intuitively I can understand this relation, since the scale factor in the past was smaller, then the wavelengths were practically more compressed, so:
z=\frac{a(t_{0})}{a(t)}-1 was much bigger than 0 (I don't know why it happens to be 0 for today)
while as time passes, and the scale factor is raising more than a(t0) the redshift is going to get "smaller"...in fact there will be always new "normalization" on the nominator, just to keep it falling "asymptotically" to 0... (the wavelengths are stretched)
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
The scale factor is a function of time which represents the relative expansion of the universe. It relates the proper distance which can change over time.

d(t)=a(t)d_o

d(t) is the proper distance, tdo is the reference time at to, where ato=1 for the present age of the universe 13.78 billion years

these relations may help understand the form you have

1+Z=\frac{\lambda}{\lambda_o}

a(t)=\frac{1}{1+Z} you should be able to derive the equation you have with thisedit forgot to add:particularly since they give
1+z=\frac{a_ (now)}{a_ (then)} and how its solved from the FLRW metric and it relation to wavelength on that same page you posted,,, grr can't recall how to subscript a word within latex but you get the idea lol
 
Last edited:
ChrisVer said:
I checked on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift
and I found that the scale factor is related to the red shift, in FRW model, by:
1+z(t) = \frac{a(t_{0})}{a(t)}
How is that derived?

The derivation is given in the Wiki entry you linked to under the section 3.2.1.

Additionally, redshift is always calculated by comparing the past to the scale factor today because today is when we are receiving the light. It doesn't make sense to speak about redshift for larger scale factors because we don't receive light from the future.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K