I know the history of how set theory came about and how Cantor showed the real numbers between (0,1) were non-denumerable.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

He did this by showing that they cant be put into a one-one correspondence with N (1, 2, 3...)

...So what does that really tell me? I know it tells me that the infinity of the reals is larger, but how does that tell me that N is countable itself?

Did we just assume N is countable by putting a one-to-one correspondence from N to N itself?

Why say "A set is countable if it can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with N."

Why pick N for the role of determining the denumerability of other sets?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How is the set of all natural numbers, N, denumerable?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**