How is the Speed of Light Formula Derived and Why is it Squared?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the derivation of the speed of light formula and the reasoning behind the squaring of the speed of light in the equation E=mc². Participants explore various aspects of the formula's origin, its implications in physics, and related concepts in relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for the derivation of the speed of light formula and the significance of it being squared.
  • Another participant suggests using Google for additional resources and mentions a previous thread on the topic in the relativity forum.
  • A participant provides a brief overview of Einstein's 1905 paper, explaining how the relationship between mass and energy leads to the formulation of E=mc², emphasizing that the derivation can be approached without direct reference to light.
  • There is mention of the Lorentz transformations and the interpretation of c as the maximum speed of causality, rather than strictly the speed of light.
  • A participant claims to have written a concise derivation of E=mc² and provides a link to their website for further reading.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the derivation or the reasons for the squaring of the speed of light, with multiple viewpoints and approaches presented throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to various sources and interpretations, but lacks a unified framework or agreement on the derivation process or the implications of the squared term in the formula.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

How is this formula derived? And why is the speed of light squared? Is there a reason for that?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://www.btinternet.com/~j.doyle/SR/Emc2/Derive.htm

Google is your friend :).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
FAQ: Where does E=mc2 come from?

Einstein found this result in a 1905 paper, titled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy content?" This paper is very short and readable, and is available online. A summary of the argument is as follows. Define a frame of reference A, and let an object O, initially at rest in this frame, emit two flashes of light in opposite directions. Now define another frame of reference B, in motion relative to A along the same axis as the one along which the light was emitted. Then in order to preserve conservation of energy in both frames, we are forced to attribute a different inertial mass to O before and after it emits the light. The interpretation is that mass and energy are equivalent. By giving up a quantity of energy E, the object has reduced its mass by an amount E/c2.

Although Einstein's original derivation happens to involve the speed of light, E=mc2 can be derived without talking about light at all. One can derive the Lorentz transformations using a set of postulates that don't say anything about light (see, e.g., Rindler 1979). The constant c is then interpreted simply as the maximum speed of causality, not necessarily the speed of light. Constructing the mass-energy four-vector of a particle, we find that its norm E2-p2c2 is frame-invariant, and can be interpreted as m2c4, where m is the particle's rest mass. In the case where the particle is at rest, p=0, and we recover E=mc2.

A. Einstein, Annalen der Physik. 18 (1905) 639, available online at http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/

Rindler, Essential Relativity: Special, General, and Cosmological, 1979, p. 51
 
I've written up a derivation that I believe to be pretty concise, without leaving anything out.

go to
www.shadycrypt.com

and click on the "E=mc2" link at the top.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
715
  • · Replies 120 ·
5
Replies
120
Views
9K