How Is the Spring Constant Calculated from Work Done?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the spring constant from the work done to stretch a spring. The problem states that 49 J of work is required to stretch a spring from 1.4 m to 2.9 m, prompting participants to explore the appropriate equations and interpretations related to spring mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the work-energy principle for springs, questioning the correct interpretation of the spring constant calculation. Some explore the use of different equations and the implications of unstretched lengths, while others suggest that the original approach may be more appropriate.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various interpretations and questioning the assumptions made in the problem statement. Some guidance has been offered regarding the correct equations to use, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach or interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the unstretched length of the spring, which affects the application of the equations. Participants note that the problem statement may be underspecified, leading to different interpretations of the work done on the spring.

bob tran
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


It requires 49 J of work to stretch an ideal very light spring from a length of 1.4 m to a length of 2.9 m. What is the value of the spring constant of this spring?

Homework Equations


u=0.5kΔx2

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}k\Delta x^2\\<br /> k=\frac{2u}{\Delta x^2}\\<br /> k=\frac{2*49}{(2.9-1.4)^2}\\<br /> k=44 \ \texttt{N}/\texttt{m}<br />
Apparently, the answer is 15 N/m.

EDIT:
It appears they have done this instead:
<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}kx_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2\\<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}k(x_f^2-x_0^2)\\<br /> k=\frac{2u}{(x_f^2-x_0^2)}\\<br /> k=\frac{2*49}{(2.9^2-1.4^2)}\\<br /> k=15 \ \texttt{N}/\texttt{m}<br />
I thought Δx would be squared after the subtraction?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
bob tran said:

Homework Statement


It requires 49 J of work to stretch an ideal very light spring from a length of 1.4 m to a length of 2.9 m. What is the value of the spring constant of this spring?

Homework Equations


u=0.5kΔx2

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}k\Delta x^2\\<br /> k=\frac{2u}{\Delta x^2}\\<br /> k=\frac{2*49}{(2.9-1.4)^2}\\<br /> k=44 \ \texttt{N}/\texttt{m}<br />
Apparently, the answer is 15 N/m.

EDIT:
It appears they have done this instead:
<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}kx_f^2 - \frac{1}{2}kx_0^2\\<br /> u=\frac{1}{2}k(x_f^2-x_0^2)\\<br /> k=\frac{2u}{(x_f^2-x_0^2)}\\<br /> k=\frac{2*49}{(2.9^2-1.4^2)}\\<br /> k=15 \ \texttt{N}/\texttt{m}<br />
I thought Δx would be squared after the subtraction?
You aren't given the unstretched length of the spring, only that it is stretched from a length of 1.4 m to 2.9 m.

The energy it takes to stretch a spring, namely E = (1/2)k x2, is applicable only for a spring which is stretched a distance x from its unstretched length.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/pespr.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob tran
The equation you used is only for when the spring is at rest, Δx is calculated from the equilibrium point. You're work would be correct if they said the spring was stretched 1.5 meters from it's equilibrium point.

Think about a spring that is as rest compared to a similar one that is stretched quiet far. The force exerted by an ideal spring increases as the spring gets further away from it's equilibrium point. If both are stretched 1.5 meters, the one that's already stretched quiet far would be harder to stretch than the one that was at rest. The equation you used would give the same answer for both springs.

The equation under "EDIT" is the one you might want to always think of, and just assign zero to the second "x" if the spring is at rest.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob tran
Bob Tran: As SteamKing points out, their answer is not correct either, unless the initial length of the spring is zero (which is silly). I think your original approach is a better interpretation of the problem statement than the given answer (although the problem statement is clearly underspecified).

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob tran
One can approach the problem in terms of the definition of work done:
$$ W = \int_{x_o}^{x_f} f(x)~dx $$
$$ W = \int_{x_o}^{x_f} k~x~dx $$
and arrive at the formula and result that the book gives.
 
@bob tran ,
What book is this problem from?
 
gneill said:
One can approach the problem in terms of the definition of work done:
$$ W = \int_{x_o}^{x_f} f(x)~dx $$
$$ W = \int_{x_o}^{x_f} k~x~dx $$
and arrive at the formula and result that the book gives.
This is correct only if the unextended length is zero, right?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
This is correct only if the unextended length is zero, right?

Chet
I believe it should apply over any segment of the stretch.
 
Chet is correct.
 
  • #10
SammyS said:
Chet is correct.
You're right. My bad :oops:
 
  • #11
SammyS said:
@bob tran ,
What book is this problem from?
Not sure. It was from a practice worksheet.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K