How Is the W^2 of the Pauli-Lubanski Pseudovector Calculated Using J13 and P3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter andrey21
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the square of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector, denoted as W², using specific terms such as J13 and P3. Participants are exploring the mathematical framework and properties of the pseudovector in the context of quantum mechanics or field theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their attempts to derive W² and share expressions involving the totally antisymmetric symbol. Questions arise regarding the expansion of terms and the application of antisymmetry properties of matrices.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into their calculations and clarifying misunderstandings. Some guidance has been offered regarding the handling of terms and the antisymmetry of matrices, though no explicit consensus on the final expression has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the mathematical definitions and properties involved, including the constraints imposed by the antisymmetry of the matrices and the specific values of the epsilon symbol. There is an acknowledgment of the need for careful handling of signs and terms in the calculations.

andrey21
Messages
475
Reaction score
0
Hi can anyone help me prove the result of W2 of the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector :
This is very new to me and I've read I must use terms such as J13 and P3

Where totally antisymmetric symbol is defined by:
\epsilon1234=1 and \epsilon1243=-1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, what have you tried ?? As per the guidelines, you must post your attempt.
 
Ok, where did you fail ? Post or attach a scan of your work.
 
Well here is my answer:

W2= 0.5 M\mu\nu M\mu\nu P2 + M\mu\rho M\nu\rho P\mu P\nu

Where the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector given was:

Wμ= - 0.5 \epsilon\mu\nu\rho\sigma J\nu\rho P\sigma
 
I get 6 terms when I expand

W_2 = -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{2\nu\sigma\rho} M^{\nu\sigma}P^{\rho} = -\frac{1}{2} \left( \epsilon_{2013} M^{01}P^{3} + \epsilon_{2031} M^{03}P^{1} + \mbox{4 other terms}\right)

I don't think you can regroup them the way you did.
 
Ok I am a little confused, could you go into more detail regarding your expansion? I am struggling to see how you got those terms! :confused:
 
Well, the epsilon for a fixed mu (=2) can only take 3 values in 3! combinations. 0,1,3 and the other 5 combinations. That's why from the possible terms you have only 6 remaining.
 
OK so the other four terms would be:

ε2301 M30P1
ε2310 M31P0
ε2130 M13P0
ε2103 M10P3
 
  • #10
Yes. Now the epsilons are +/-1 and you can regroup alike terms based on antisymmetry of M.
 
  • #11
OK so the antisymmetry rule again is:

Mab=M-ab
 
  • #12
M_ab = - M_ba you mean...

EDIT: Yes, exactly. ;)
 
Last edited:
  • #13
:smile: Thats what I meant...

So M31= - M13 for example...
 
  • #14
So using that information and that:

ε1234=1 and ε1243=-1

W2= -1/2 (-J10P3+ J30P1+J10P3 +J31P0-J30P1-J31P0)

=-1/2 (0)
 
  • #15
No, no, no. It's 2 times minus for 3 terms in the bracket, one minus from epsilon, one minus from M, so the terms don't have opposite signs, but equal (choose all 3 with plus). So you have 3 times double contribution. The 2 can be then factored and canceled with the 2 in the denominator.
 
  • #16
I understand so you end up with:

W2= -(J10P3+J30P1+J31P0)

Correct?
 
  • #17
Looks ok. Half the permutations of 0,1,3.

EDIT for post below: Don't mention it.
 
  • #18
So I have the correct answer, that's great. Thanks for all your help :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K